Will Gevo Want $1 Billion To Execute Its Biofuels Strategy?

August 16, 2010

Gevo announced plans to sell $150 million of its stock to the public. Apparently it really needs the money!

The track record for biofuels IPOs has not been good over the years. There is little to suggest it is much changed now. So one would imagine that any money-losing biofuels company – like Gevo – will eventually end up dealing with a restless group of profit-minded shareholders.

So why test the financial markets and risk years of lackluster investor response – similar to what biofuels company Codexis and battery maker A123 have experienced during their public lives so far?

Gevo’s S-1 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday answers that question. It’s called money – perhaps $1 billion of it.

Gevo explains that its ambition is to use the cash it raises from its IPO to buy existing ethanol plants (directly and through joint ventures) and convert them to isobutanol production using the company’s proprietary technology. Gevo’s technology breaks down a variety of feedstocks, such as corn, wheat, sugar cane and cellulosic materials, into sugars using a yeast biocatalyst. A second piece of the process is an isobutanol separations unit that bolts onto an ethanol plant.

Isobutanol is a specialty chemical that substitutes for ethanol and blends with gasoline. It also is used in the production of plastics, rubber, lubricants and polyester.

The company presently has an agreement to acquire one facility, a 22 million gallon plant in Minnesota, which it is to buy for $20.7 million from Agri-Energy. The deal was announced earlier this week.

The company’s long-term goal is to produce more than 500 million gallons of isobutanol by 2014. To that end, Gevo states in its S-1 that, “We may require substantial additional financing to achieve our goals” and “we may seek additional capital through a combination of public and private equity offerings, debt financings, strategic partnerships and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale or issuance of equity, warrants or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a stockholder.”

In other words, prepare for a massive company scale up. Consider this back of the envelope calculation. To reach an annual production target of 500 million gallons, Gevo will need 28 plants similar to the 22 million gallon facility it is buying in Minnesota. That’s because after converting the plant to isobutanol, production will fall to 18 million gallons a year. If one such plant costs $20.7 million, 27 additional plants will cost about $559 million. Add to that conversion costs of about $17 million a plant, or another $459 million. Together the sum is more than $1 billion.

This price tag may be reduced if the company relies on joint ventures. But then so too is its profit potential.

Gevo is not the first biofuels producer to recently target the public financial markets. Amyris filed in April with hopes of raising $100 million, even if it seems in no rush. The company in June raised more than $130 million in additional private capital and struck an equity deal with an affiliate of the French oil and gas giant Total.

PetroAlgae also announced a $200 million IPO this week.

It will be an interesting test in coming months to see how investors feel about funding an industry that is still learning to plant both feet on the ground – and which will need a bunch of money to do so.


Are Venture Capitalists Starving Clean Tech Innovation?

July 22, 2010

Clean-tech investing is a top priority for venture capitalists. But a big chunk of their money is avoiding the tiniest, early-stage start-ups with the most ambitious plans for innovation in favor of more established, later stage businesses.

The result could be a dearth of innovation several years from now, when a new generation of companies might be expected to fuel growth in the industry.

The trend toward later stage investing appears to have been gathering steam in the past year. In 2008, 197 follow-on investment deals were sealed in the United States compared with 93 first-round financings, a 2-to-1 ratio of later stage versus early stage.

In the first quarter of this year, the ratio was closer to 3-to-1, with 85 follow-on rounds completed compared with 31 first fundings.

“There are too few start-ups,” complains long-time industry insider Mark Jensen, managing partner for national venture capital services at Deloitte & Touche.

This shift comes amid a clear sign that clean tech is a growing venture capital priority – both domestically and abroad. A recent study from Deloitte & Touche and the National Venture Capital Association found that 80 percent of general partners plan to increase their clean-tech investing over the next five years. The commitment was far ahead of their number two priority, health care services, which 63 percent said they would fund more actively.

The survey contacted more than 500 venture capitalists in nine countries, including the United States, China, France, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Canada, Israel and India. And it found the intentions were pretty uniform country to country. Clean tech was the top focus for VCS in the United States, China, India, the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada and France.

And yet in countries such as the United States and Europe, money is flowing most readily to later stage businesses where partners hope for a big kill if a high profile Better Place or Amyris goes public.

The fallout is that early-stage entrepreneurs are forced to seek money from angel investors for seed and sometimes first rounds. In some cases, angels have begun playing the role of venture capitalists, but with less cash to deploy.

This was clearly the case in the second quarter. Venture capitalists in the United States set a quarterly record by investing $1.47 billion in clean-tech start-ups, a 107 percent increase from the first quarter.

But the number of companies receiving money remained almost unchanged at 71, compared with 70 in the first quarter.

Large deals dominated. Better Place raised $350 million, BrightSource collected $150 million and Boston Power added $62 million to its bank account.

Experts such as Jensen say they don’t expect the trend to reverse itself any time soon. At least not until VCs start making some money on clean-tech and become more comfortable taking on risk.

Until then, early stage businesses are likely to find money hard to get.


Clean Tech IPOs Have Much To Prove, Says Top VC

April 26, 2010

Clean-tech IPOs have yet to prove themselves.

Sure, investor excitement is on the rise with Tesla Motors, Solyndra, Amyris and Ameresco preparing to sell shares to the public. Another potential blockbuster, Silver Spring Networks, is said to have chosen its investment bankers.

It appears the market for clean-tech IPOs is thawing, says Erik Straser, a venture capitalist at Mohr Davidow Ventures

But the track record of recent green IPOs is anything but encouraging. Lithium battery maker A123 Systems went public in September and its shares trade below their introductory price.

Sensata Technologies Holding, a sensor maker from the Netherlands, is hanging onto a gain over its initial price in March, but only a modest one. Biofuel maker Codexis, which debuted its shares last week, is suffering the same fate. And the fortunes of Jinko Solar Holding of China are worse. It canceled its coming out altogether.

“The clean-tech IPOs at this stage are still proving themselves,” says Erik Straser, a partner at the venture firm Mohr Davidow Ventures and leader of its cleantech investment team. Nevertheless, “it appears the markets today are thawing.”

Straser says it is likely there will be more clean-tech IPO filings this year and even a period when less mature companies will go public. That’s because the criteria for what a company needs to interest investors is unsettled.

Several years ago, a high-tech company might need $100 million in annual revenue and profits to attract investors. Clean-tech companies appear to have more latitude. Revenue can be in the neighborhood of $50 million, Straser said in an interview, and business models vary.

Some companies have high production costs and are working them down. Others have businesses that are more future than present. Silicon Valley electric car manufacturer Tesla is an example.

The company sells its Roadster sports car today, but IPO investors will bet on the success of the less expensive Model S sedan, he says. What the Roadster did is show there is a high-end market for high-end electric cars, says Straser, who has invested in green-tech firms such as ZeaChem, Nanosolar and OPX Biotechnologies.

Still, it is hard to predict how clean-tech IPOs will do this year. What is clear is that at some point, investors will become more discriminating and look for more mature companies rather than trendy ones, says Straser. When will this occur? No one knows.


Amyris Closes On Another $24.7 Million And Expects More This Fall

August 21, 2009

Amyris Biotechnologies’ reputation as one of the more closely watched bio-fuels startup is secure.

The new money will be used to accelerate the development of Amyris bio-fuel

The new money will be used to accelerate the development of Amyris' bio-fuel

The Emeryville company announced two days ago it raised another $24.75 million and now says it expects to complete the rest of an estimated $62 million Series C round by this fall.

The round is being led by existing white-shoe investors: Khosla Ventures and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. TPG Biotech and the Brazilian conglomerate Votorantim Novos Negocios also are leading the round.

The company is among the highest profile startups attempting to use a bio-engineered form of yeast to convert sugar cane into a variety of renewable fuels and chemicals, including a diesel replacement. In June, it showed off a demonstration facility built in the heart of the Brazilian sugar cane processing industry.

The company plans to use the $24.75 million it raised to accelerate the development of its bio-fuel operations. The plan is to begin commercializing the fuels and chemicals in 20i1, with a goal of producing 200 million gallons a year.

The company had previously raised $120 million.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers