Skype Not Available on Android Market? Get Tango!

October 4, 2010

Skype is still not available on most Android phones

The Skype application is still missing in action for most Android users.

After a private screening of the movie “The Social Network” on Friday in Redwood City, I chat with someone from Skype that assured me the VOIP application was already available for my phone.

At that point, I though that it was game over for Palo Alto, Calif.-startup Tango that just launched at GigaOM’s Mobilize conference, a Skype-like app for smartphones (Android and iPhones) which does audio and video calls over the data network (3G or WiFi).

But when I checked back this morning to do a Skype call with my Android phone (Nexus One on T-Mobile), I realised the Skype app is still only available to Android phones on the Verizon network. Bummer!

So I decided to try out Tango for my all my VOIP calls and have fun with the video calling feature that is, in many ways similar to the Apple iPhone 4 FaceTime video phone call application… but for the rest of us! More on Tango later.

Skype better get its act together, sooner rather than later. Because, although it takes 2 to Tango, Skype might just not be part of the dance for very much long!


[Video] H-P To Expand Palm Smartphone Lineup; Extend WebOS To Printers, Netbooks

August 26, 2010

Inspite media reports, HP has no plans to shelve Palm smartphones.

“On the contrary,” insists Tim Pettitt, Palm’s senior product manager of smartphones at a briefing today in San Francisco, Calif. “Palm is going to be the mobility play for HP!”

Expect to see more smartphones coming from HP/Palm as well new mobile devices such as tablets/slates, printers and netbooks, all powered by the company’s mobile operating system, WebOS.

“Our goal is really to expand the form factor. We built WebOS to go on any device. So we knew we’re going to move off smartphones eventually… So definitely you’ll keep seeing things new coming out from Palm.”

It’ll be interesting to see if HP/Palm is able to break in the smartphone market, today dominated by Apple’s iPhone, Google Android and RIM. But you can forget about Nokia. The Finnish company just doesn’t get mobile Internet.


Antennagate: Jobs Fires iPhone 4 Hardware Chief

August 9, 2010

What do you do after your product gets leaked to the media months before it’s ready, and after it launches, you realize it’s the buggiest iPhone ever and in a desperate move, you post bogus videos of competiting phones?

Well… you just hope your boss is not Steve Jobs!

Joke aside, this is exactly what happened to Mark Papermaster who joined Apple under  20 months ago and “resigned” over the weekend from his position as Senior Vice President of Devices Hardware Engineering a.k.a. iPhone 4 Hardware Chief.

And this, after a long struggle for Apple to get Papermaster from the clutches of IBM where he had given a good 25 years.

The empty spot will be now taken over by Bob Mansfield, the SVP of the Mac hardware team. Mansfield was also actively involved with the architecture of the iPhone 4, which makes him, for Jobs, the best choice Papermaster.

Hey Steve! Now that you’ve fired the half-culprit of the iPhone 4 fiasco (the other one is you, remember?), don’t you think it’s time to replace the cute iBrick 4 and give us something we can actually use? Just a thought.

Techpulse 360


Intel’s New Shopping Craze: Wireless Technologies For Smartphones

August 5, 2010

Remember the late 90′s, when Intel was throwing billions in its quest to become a telecommunication powerhouse, to finally write it all off?

Well, sounds that the chipmaker is at it again with the recent acquisitions of Infineon’s cellular and GPS technology as well as the assets of small 4G vendor Comsys.

Hopefully, the mastermind of Intel’s first telecom foray, Sean Maloney, might remember one or two things learned from his first failed attempt to build a communications empire!

As analyst Linley Gwennap writes it,

“Making it clear that money is no object in its quest to become a major player in the smartphone market, Intel plans to acquire the wireless operations of Infineon in a deal valued at more than $1.2 billion. Infineon’s cellular and GPS technology will complement Intel’s Atom processor and Wi-Fi expertise, allowing Intel to deliver a complete solution for the rapidly growing smartphone and tablet-computer markets.”

Infineon ranked fourth in cellular-baseband shipments last year with 10.7% unit share, according to a recent report from The Linley Group. Infineon is a major supplier to Apple, Nokia, and Samsung.

But “the German vendor lacks an application processor, however, making success in the smartphone market difficult, and it has struggled to sell its 3G baseband outside of Apple,” adds Linley.

The analyst adds that in a quieter but significant move, Comsys acquisitions brings a processor for WiMax phones and was working on converting that design to support LTE.

Intel’s secret goal (well not anymore!) is to merge Infineon and Comsys technologies to create its own 4G solution coupled to its Atom chip for smartphones.

“Intel is clearly focused on smartphones, leaving the future of Infineon’s popular 2G processors in doubt. This deal could end up helping vendors such as Broadcom, MediaTek, and ST-Ericsson, which could step into the breach with their own 2G processors. Conversely, the deal gives Intel the technology it needs to develop an integrated 3G-smartphone processor, allowing it to compete against vendors such as Qualcomm and Marvell,” says Linley.

First published in TechPulse 360.


[Video] Death Grip Is Unique To Apple iPhone 4, UK Tests confirms

August 2, 2010

So there you have it.

As most of us knew, but only a few (like TechPulse 360) were brave enough to speak out, Apple screwed up in its iPhone 4 antenna design. And pointing to similar problems at competitors phone revealed to be… well pointless!

To the point that Apple was forced over the weekend to erase all its flawed claims from its website after a report from PA Consulting Group confirmed that the “death grip” or “antennagate” is indeed unique to the iPhone 4.

“In the majority of the tests PA’s wireless technologists found the iPhone 4’s performance was in the same range as the other smartphones tested (Blackberry 9700, HTC HD2), but it was consistently at the lower end of that range. And, as found by other testers, when used in the “death grip”, the iPhone4’s performance was significantly worse than other smartphones,” writes the UK-based firm.

Now what?

Steve, recall the damn thing and fix it once and for all, instead of inventing flaws at other phones that don’t exist! And if it’s not too much asking, don’t forget to apologize to your customers and fans too!


Is Apple Making iPhone 3G Totally Unusable To Force Upgrade?

July 28, 2010

The best thing an iPhone 3G user can do is to "downgrade" their not-so-smart phone !

Such customer disdain from Apple comes as no surprise.

It’s been a month since Apple released iOS 4 for iPhone 3G and 3GS and that consumers have been complaining – even on Apple’s discussion forums – of all sorts of problems directly related to the upgrade: unbearably slow, rapid battery drain or excessive heat!

And by the way, the upgrade to 4.0.1 doesn’t help either.

But the worse is Apple’s attitude. Just like with “Antennagate” Apple pooh-poohed criticisms, that is, until today. FINALLY! Steve, where are you? Still in Hawaii?

Apple is investigating reports that the latest iPhone operating system causes problems for users of the iPhone 3G, after a series of complaints on Apple support forums and technology blogs,” writes the Wall Street Journal online.

Here are examples of customer complaints.

But the iphone is very slow with IOS4. It doesn’t work as smooth as it used to be. Also new applications such as the iBook application are very slow, doesn’t respond smooth on screentaps etc.

This is absolutely ridiculous, the additions to the 3G handset are consolidation of email, a zoom to the camera and folders on the homepage….so why the **** has the handset slowed to snails pace??!

5 seconds to open the text window. Another 3 seconds to get a popup text input keyboard. 3 seconds to open the email window

This is such an outrageous situation that even the most loyal Apple fans are feeling that the Cupertino, Calif. is forcing them to upgrade to the iPhone 4 by making their iPhone 3G totally unusable!

“This phone has gone from being a dream to constantly annoying me. Not a way to make friends. I would upgrade to an iPhone 4, but I’m feeling pretty angry that Apple has forced my hand by making my 3G unusable,” wrote a user on the Apple support discussion forum.

So, Apple here’s YOUR roadmap for the next few weeks:

  1. Fix the iOS4 operating system or at least give your most loyal customers an option to downgrade to the older operating system!
  2. Fix the iPhone 4 antenna. Recall the whole damn thing and finally sell a flawless device that actually works the way it should;
  3. Fix the white iPhone 4  manufacturing and please stop lying about shipping dates
  4. Oh, and I forgot… and this one is for the boss… APOLOGIZE for all the trouble your lies caused to faithful fans and aggrieved customers!

Could HP Be The Next Apple?

July 23, 2010

The heading is pretty hard to digest, but sounds ever justified given how things have been shaping with Hewlett Packard, especially after it acquired Palm and its much vaunted WebOS.

Lets start off with HP and its place in the market. The manufacturer is primarily known for being the Goliath of the Tech industry, but has dwindled recently to the sleek and much more pleasant Apple and others.

The comparison, though odd is more like the ageing Hollywood heroes being replaced by the younger, fresher hunks. The giant has been selling off machines in every shop across the street, it was impressive in the past, when people only knew products they saw kept in the brick and mortar shops.

Not anymore, times have changed and with the advent of the more smarter and sleeker machines like of iMacs and MacBooks or the iPad, HP doesn’t stand a chance and that is exactly what is hurting them now. It wants to undergo a facelift, a makeover and take the market by storm. But how?

Windows is HP’s nightmare

HP has the expertise to produce quality hardware but has been left sabotaged by Microsoft, which continues to be the sole operating system for HP machines.  But that is set to change soon.

As mentioned earlier, the acquisition of Palm and its WebOS has given HP the right OS to integrate with its hardware. Likewise HP also thought of giving a shot at Android with its anticipated tablet before dropping the idea, to focus more on WebOS. This is another reason which sort of solidifies my stand that HP is trying hard to create a niche for itself, just like Apple has.

Of course there are tougher challenges, especially in the smartphone arena where it has competition from Google’s Android as well. But unlike Google, HP has what Google doesn’t: proprietary software and hardware , which resembles Apple’s eco-system.

But, to be Apple, HP has a lot of restructuring to do. All the way from bringing out a really impressive piece of hardware powered by an equally impressive and user friendly operating system and  perhaps an equally impressive marketing strategy with its own retail stores.

From what I know,people don’t mind paying a few extra bucks for a quality product and even lining outside your stores days before your first product is for sale.

So if HP is trying to bang head on with Apple, it must understand Apple isn’t about a great hardware, software or Steve Jobs. But more about the best user experience. Something which might prove to be a pretty big challenge for HP.

All I can say is that HP could  become a better HP in the process, but might find it hard to being anything remotely close to Apple.


Financial Roundup: Apple Soars, Google Pays Lobbyists $1.34 Million

July 21, 2010

The last couple of days have been interesting, especially related to Apple and it’s Antennagate dilemma and stellar quarter that bamboozled people at Wall Street all the way to Google’s Q2 earning today.

It is interesting to draw comparison how the two have done in the financial scenario. Apple boasting heavy earnings while Google siding more with spending revenue on lobbying. That is quite less surprising, given how the search giant has been caught up resolving legal issues, etc.

Coming to Apple first, the third quarter broke all past records with a massive revenue worth $15.7 billion with net profits flying past $3.25 billion. No one at Apple or at Wall Street had estimated such returns, which are higher and better than how Apple has done during the holiday seasons as well. A summary on what made those numbers possible is:

  • 3.47 Million Macs sold
  • 8.4 million iPhones
  • 9.41 million iPods
  • 3.27 Million iPads (a fresh product)

Of all those numbers, only the iPhone sales have gone down from 8.75 Million to 8.4 Million and the iPods sales continue to fall, which isn’t surprising. The main reason is that Apple has been releasing new products, so people usually wait for the 3Gs or the iPhone 4, instead.

As for the iPod, I personally think it has become quite a useless device, given that all features are already included in the iPhone, which has more uses and is far more powerful. However, the sales of Macs and the very new iPad have done an impressive business. Apple, despite its current hunched approach towards issues manages to deliver great products that keep the company on top of the line and enjoys a great reputation amongst its lovers.

And now, for Google. The search giant continues its efforts to please officials, who are otherwise almost always running after it. In the current quarter, the search engine has spent over $1.34 Million for the same cause, which is around 40% higher than what it spent in Q2 2009. The lobbying efforts aren’t just confined to search, Google is also pushing on the accelerator on reforms for patents, security issues associated to cloud based computing, data privacy, censorship, etc. That is not the end of the story, the search goliath has been after third parties to assist it with the lobbying efforts. Some of those include:

  • Will DeVries: Who worked for Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr as an attorney before he joined Google in 2010 as policy counsel.
  • Robert Tai: Employed previously at Business Software Alliance as a manager of Cyber Crime Prevention and in the Research Division of California Governor’s office before joining Google in 2007.
  • Dorothy Chou: A graduate from Georgetown University joined Google as policy analyst in 2008.
  • Jennifer Taylor: held positions at Ron Lewis and the British Embassy during 2000 – 2010 before joining Google in 2010 as a new lobbyist for the second quarter as a policy analyst.

The search giant has spent $150,000 on Podesta Group Inc, $120,000 on Dutko Worldwide, $90,000 on Franklin Square Group, $60,000on Liberty Partners group and $50,000 on McBee Strategic Consulting.


Analyst: Apple Must Fix iPhone Faulty Antenna Design

July 21, 2010

In a report published today, MobileTrax principal analyst Gerry Purdy calls Apple to fix the iPhone 4 faulty antenna design.

Apple will need to fix the faulty design of the iPhone antenna. I can assure you that the iPhone 5 won’t have that problem. It might have another problem, but it won’t continue the antenna problems in the iPhone 4. I’m confident that Apple engineering will ensure the future iPhone (and iPad) products will have antennas that work properly.

Apple’s faulty design has consumers wonder if they should buy Apple’s smartphone or not

It has been a real nightmare for Apple, certainly a cause for consternation with millions of iPhone customers, and perhaps a “Wait a minute, should I buy one of these?’ hesitation for a number of prospective iPhone buyers.

And the real winner of Apple’s “Antennagate” ? Antenna engineers!

Simply holding a device should not interfere in any significant way with the network signal reception. And Antennagate will cause other firms such as HTC, Motorola, RIM and Samsung to increase antenna design capabilities to ensure that they won’t have a repeat of the same problem as Apple experienced. It should be a ‘field day’ for antenna design consultants to help all SmartPhone manufacturers fix antenna problems.


[Video] Apple Must Recall Flawed iPhone 4

July 16, 2010

When this  happened to Toyota a few months ago, it was forced to spend billions of dollars to recall and repair the flawed cars. In addition, the Japanese car company had to pay a fine to the U.S. for putting unsafe vehicles on the road. The same applies for drugs, food, etc.

So why shouldn’t Apple be forced to recall its iPhone 4 and fix the hardware flaw the once and for all instead of giving away cheap cases? Consumers around the world should not pay “full price” for a flaw product. Apple’s or anyone else’s.

Steve Jobs, did you miss the call for the iPhone 4 recall?

I call it shameful, very shameful especially the lame excuse by Mr. Perfect, Steve Jobs that “we aren’t perfect” when it comes to the iPhone 4 and its antenna problem.

Wasn’t Apple known for its flawlessness? Isn’t this what made Apple addicts stand out from the crowd and point fingers to  the imperfect designs and functions of competitors?

“Between AT&T and the antenna problem, this “phone” can do everything but a phone call. Plus I am a lefty. It’s unusable,” commented a user.

Apple CEO came on stage at a press conference the company held this morning in its Cupertino, Calif. headquarters to address the gnawing antenna issue: the imperfect human being and an imperfect design. Need we say anything?

Why would Apple act so immaturely? I am surprised they didn’t know about the issue before they launched the device at the WWDC 2010. Actually, according to a Bloomberg News report, Apple antenna chief engineer Ruben Caballero told Steve Jobs that the iPhone 4 design will hurt wireless connectivity.

To make things worse, users voiced almost immediately on the release of the device the connectivity issue. After initially falling into Jobs depth ears, Apple is now forced to come clean, pointing fingers to competitors flaws!

But this time, Steve Jobs trick to take attention off the iPhone 4 problem by pointing similar handling issues with other mobile devices – the BlackBerry, Omnia, HTC, etc – wouldn’t do.

“Antenna technology can be tricky, but as far as I know, it’s not something that has plagued smartphones in the way Steve Jobs characterized. He has a way of making Apple problems everyone’s problems when it suits them,” confided an industry insider.

I am not sure when was the last time he loved calling out names of devices other than those from Apple, but he sure has taken the names this time to justify the flaw in the iPhone. It might just be one call that is dropped in a 100 or so a user makes, but given the reputation Apple and its products enjoy, this is an absolutely crazy approach to cover up your flaws.

So how should I hold my iPhone 4? Or should I bluff about the issue stating that my gadget is competing more directly with other devices? Funny but I congratulate Apple on becoming apart of imperfection.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers