[Video] Sybase Bearish On Mobile Advertising Opportunity; Sees Mobile Video Surge

November 17, 2009

Sybase 365 Marty Beard bullish on the mobility market, but not mobile advertising

When I think of Sybase, I naturally imagine large databases and perhaps analytics software, but not as a mobile messaging operator!

But as I learned last night, I was dead wrong: Sybase, through its mobile subsidiary Sybase 365 is the world’s largest inter-operator mobile messaging company.

This year, Sybase 365 expects to reach $200 million in revenues (up 14% from last year) or about 1/5 of the company overall revenues.

“We connect virtually all the 900+ mobile operators in the world and reach over 4 billion mobile phone users [out of 7 billion worldwide],” explains to me Sybase 365 President Marty Beard, speaking yesterday at TiE’s first entrepreneur week in Santa Clara, Calif.

For Beard, the closest competitors are Syniverse – which recently acquired Verisign’s mobile messaging business for $175 million in cash – and Ericsson IPX solution.

Mobile advertising has not lived up to its promise

By being at the centre of the world’s SMS and MMS (Multimedia Messaging Service) traffic, Sybase 365 can spot early trends in mobile commerce around the globe including hot areas like mobile CRM, mobile banking and mobile money transfer. Surprisingly, mobile advertising is not one of them.

“Most of the mobile advertising business has been around messaging, sending SMS or MMS to consumers and not banners or even ads inside these messages. Pure advertising on mobility has just not lived up to its billing at this point,” adds Beard.

Sybase saw traffic surge after Apple enabled MMS on iPhone

Another new trend in the mobility market is the uptake of videos transferred on mobile networks using MMS. This is especially true since Apple added the MMS feature to its latest iPhone 3GS device. ”When Apple enabled MMS, the traffic spiked 600% and video is a huge part of that,” said Beard.

Follows are excerpts of our video interview with Beard at the TiE event. First on Sybase 365′s business:

And then on mobile advertising:


Mozilla Chief Innovation Officer: Being The Dominant Browser Is Not Sign Of Success

August 6, 2009

By crossing the billion downloads mark, Mozilla is well on its way to become the dominant Web browser on computer desktops.

But being the #1 Web browser does not appear to be the “be all, end all” goal for the Mountain View non-profit maker of Firefox.

“We don’t have an idea of what the end goal is but… we feel we are successful if the Internet feels vibrant, fun and exciting and still feel relevant to you as an individual.

An oddity at Mozilla: our mission is to bring choice and innovation so having dominant marketshare is not a success condition by definition… so being the monopoly browser is not in the cards for us… but being able to shape the future of the Internet is,” explains Mozilla’s Chief Innovation Officer Chris Beard during a panel discussion at the Lunch 2.0 event hosted today at Kosmix in Mountain View, Calif.

Spearheading Mozilla’s innovation programme, Beard’s mission is to bring more people/volunteers into Mozilla’s design and developing process to help the 200-people organisation build Internet technologies for desktops, mobile, etc.

“Our Mozilla Labs programme where we invite anybody who has an idea for how the Web or the Web experience could be better and to come and participate. From there, we then prototype, then incubate new ideas that potentially become product features or new capabilities for the Web.”

However, Beard was also quick to point out that despite everything that Mozilla does is open, “we do not do design by commitee, we do not vote on what the user interface should be, because that barely works. So we still need to exercise leadership and vision but also figure out how to engage our users.”

On the software patent issue, Beard had this to say: “there’s not a whole lot we can protect, or go after people for stealing. In fact, please come take our stuff, it’s all open source license!”

Here’s a video excerpt (more videos after the jump) where Chris Beard explains his role at Mozilla, as well the reasons behind developing Fennec, Mozilla’s future mobile browser expected to publicly launch in September.

Read the rest of this entry »


Analyst: Solid State Drives Will Never Match Hard Disks In Price And Capacity

March 18, 2009

Analyst Jim Handy does not expect prices for SSDs to match HDDs

Last week, Brian Beard, a Samsung executive, went out and predicted that solid state drives (SSD) will soon be as cheap if not even cheaper than hard disk drives.

For now, it looks like a far out shot as currently a 256GB SSD – the highest capacity commercially available – costs around $489 for the Super Talent SSD, versus less than $80 for the equivalent disk drive. That’s 6 times less!

For Jim Handy, Objective Analysis’ analyst covering the Flash industry, the price parity between SSDs and HDDs sounds indeed like a pipe dream.

“Samsung does make both HDDs and SSDs, so these comments should be balanced, but I suspect the HDD side is regretting Brian Beard’s comments right now [Beard is in the SSD group],” said Handy.

However, Beard has a point. If the 60 per cent annual megabyte price decline of NAND continues – versus 40 to 45 per cent for HDDs – it’s just a matter of a few years before the dollar-per-gigabyte price parity is reached.

The problem is that the 60 per cent per year price reduction is not sustainable by cost reductions alone, according to SanDisk’s CEO, Eli Harari.

So what to believe? Here’s what Jim Handy had to say on the issue raised by Beard.

Price parity will never happen as long as HDD prices keep pace with SSD’s

If you ask when an SSD will cost the same as an HDD, well, that has always been the case, as long as the SSD is significantly smaller than an HDD.  If you want to know when an SSD will match the price AND the capacity of an HDD, that is unlikely to occur for at least for another decade, if ever.  HDD price per gigabyte drops at a rate that is between 40 to 50 per cent per year. So it’s keeping pace with SSDs and it’s projected to continue to do that over the long term.

NAND Flash is selling below cost, but it’s bouncing back

Something that many people don’t seem to realize is that manufacturing cost really does limit the speed at which prices can fall.  When the market moves from profitability to losses (during the transition from an undersupply to an oversupply) prices drop very quickly to absorb all the margins.

During this time a 60 per cent price drop is possible – even normal.  Once prices have reached manufacturing costs the fall will slow to match the speed at which costs decline.  For NAND that rate is 40 per cent per year.  We are actually in a market today where NAND has sold below cost, but it’s bouncing back up to cost.

Micron might file an anti-dumping suit against Asian rivals

It is very likely that Micron, in a year or two, will file an anti-dumping complaint against other NAND makers for the period during which NAND was selling for below $2.00/GB, since most manufacturers’ cost is about $2.00 today. The treat of such lawsuits forces NAND (or DRAM) makers to keep their prices above costs.

NAND Flash pricing is very predictable

NAND pricing is actually pretty predictable to anyone who has lived through a number of down cycles in commodity memory markets and has come to understand the very predictable path this pricing follows.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers