PwC: Venture Capital Industry Not Scalable (video)

February 1, 2011

In 2010, venture capital firms raised $12 billion (down from $16B in 2009) and invested $22 billion (up from $18B). For PricewaterhouseCoopers Steve Bengston, who spoke this morning at SDForum’s Quarterly Venture Breakfast, this is simply not sustainable.

Good News: deals are up

According to the MoneyTree report which tracks venture capital investing, venture capitalists invested $21.8 billion in 3,277 deals in 2010, an increase of 19% in dollars and a 12% rise in deals over the prior year. More here.

“2010 was a kind of a funny year… 3 flat quarters and one outlier which is really more of function of about 3 huge cleantech deals, so it wouldn’t be too much off the mark to say that 2010 was a bunch of $5 billion quarters,” explains Bengston.

Bad News: weak IPO market, lack of funds, no jobs, shrinking VCs, China

“The problem with venture capital is not how much (deals) is coming in, but how much it’s coming out,” says Bengston talking about the lack of IPOs.

Also, 2010 saw the biggest delta between VC investing and VC fund raising ($12B), the lowest since 2004. It’s not scalable!

On jobs, Silicon Valley saw no net job creation in 15 years!

“Here’s a period arguably the greatest period of wealth creation in the history of civilisation and there is no more jobs today than there were 15 years ago,” adds Bengston.

VC industry is shrinking:

“There’s a prominent VC that did their own study that claims that 97% of VC profits come from 15 companies each year. Now let’s say it’s only 90% coming from 30 companies. But it still begs the question: how many VCs do you need to find the 30 really good companies each year. Today the answer is: about 2000; and you might think it’s more than you need.”

On China:

“David Rubinstein, the CEO of Carlyle, was quoted recently saying that China was the #1 economy in 15 of the last 18 centuries. So, just because they had a couple of bad centuries, you don’t want to rule them out. They have a history of success.”

Other highlights of  2010 venture investing:

  • Silicon Valley: 40% of the total VC investments, up from 23% in 1995
  • 30 years ago, Boston was the mecca for venture capital investing
  • Silicon Valley took over Boston about 15 years ago
  • Now, Southern California is emerging as the next big area that might eventually eclipse Boston in a year or 2
  • But no new net creation of jobs in Silicon Valley in the last 15 years
  • About 200 series A deals (~$1 billion invested) per quarter
  • Most of the money has been going in later stages, expansion rounds
  • There were even “N” rounds of investing in 2010!
  • Top active VC: Kleiner Perkins with 79 deals, over a deal/week; then First Round Capital and NEA
  • Intel is the only corporation that has ever made the “Most Active VC” list
  • 72 IPOs in 2010 vs 12 in 2009 or 6 in 2008; timid come back
  • 274 mergers and acquisitions, the biggest since at least ’04; but low valuations
  • Advertising is migrating to the Web and reach 20% of the $600 billion market
  • Asian millionaires exceeds European millionaires

Gaming Startups Fail To Attract Large Venture Investments

April 21, 2009

Comparatively speaking, gaming startups tend to attract less VC fundings than other tech companies

Comparatively speaking, gaming startups tend to attract less VC fundings than other tech companies

Gaming is hot, but venture investments in the sector are still much lower than most other tech sectors.

Last year, gaming startups – mostly from Silicon Valley and some in LA/Orange county – raised a total of $315 million in 53 deals.

“It’s not a huge sector. Actually most of the big winners don’t have venture funding. And that’s because gaming is a hits business which gets a disproportionate influence despite its lack of investing,” said PwC managing director Steve Bengston at SDForum’s event on gaming investing.

In his retrospective of last year’s gaming investing, Bengston outlined the top 5 gaming venture investors (Silicon Valley’s Founders Fund, Redpoint Ventures and True Ventures and East Coast-based Columbia Capital and Greylock Partners).

Also speaking at the SDForum event were venture capitalists Ken Elefant of Opus Capital, Michael Kim of Rustic Canyon Partners and Ho Nam of Altos Ventures, who were sharing their experience in gaming investing which I will cover on a upcoming post.


Venture Industry To Shrink By Half In 2009; Bottoming At $15 Billion

April 21, 2009
With a lack of exits, venture capital is not as attractive for investors anymore, says Steve Bengston, a director at PwC

With lack of "exits", venture capital less attractive to investors, says Steve Bengston, a managing director at PwC

The venture capital industry is going to get a lot smaller than anyone expected.

Speaking this morning at the SDForum’s event on investing in gaming, PwC managing director, Steve Bengston, predicted the venture industry is heading back to it’s 1997 levels; investing about $15 billion annually versus over $28 billion last year, and $105 billion in 2000.

“This year will be better than 1997, when we had a viable healthy venture capital business. However, only half of the firms and the general partners today will survive. But there’s nothing inherently problematic to this as it always was the top quartile that made all of the money anyway,” explained Bengston.

For the PwC executive and all the major investors, the question that remains is who are going to be those leading VCs.

“Venture capitalists have not been good at transferring their skills to the next generation. Today, most of the original founders are still in place but when they leave, we might see funds go to younger firms,” adds Bengston.

Another issue that plagues the venture community is the lack of returns which makes it a less attractive to large investors.

“Venture investing is a risky asset class, and investors are asking for a premium in returns of the risk. Historically, returns have been around 20 percent, now it’s more 10 to 15 percent. There are simply no exits, it’s illiquid,” said Bengston.

For entrepreneurs, a smaller venture capital industry means that the little money available for funding is now going to be much harder to get!


Venture Capitalists Will Invest Less in 2009; Bet For IPO Market To Reopen In 2010

December 17, 2008
In 2009, entrepreneurs will find it much harder to get their startups financed

In 2009, entrepreneurs will find it much harder to get their startups financed

U.S. venture capitalists are forecasting a difficult 2009, with lower investment across most sectors and a continued shuttered IPO market until 2010, lowering the value of any potential acquisition transaction.

According to the third annual National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) Predictions Survey released today, startups looking for early-stage and seed investments, as well as companies in the semiconductor, media/entertainment and wireless markets, will be the hardest hit; finding it very difficult to get funded.

While the clean technology and life sciences sectors will remain a brighter spot next year, receiving more investments.

More venture capital firms will shut down

Venture capitalist expect total investments to fall below $27 billion in 2009, less than this year’s expected $29 to $30 billion range. But which is still far better than during the 2002-2006 period

These market challenges will take their toll on the venture capital industry’s performance. The declining returns will affect venture capital firms ability to raise additional funds from institutional investors.

“There will be a lot of venture capital firms that will disappear in this cycle. Especially the ones that have to raise money in 2009,” explains PwC managing director, Steve Bengston.

The NVCA survey was conducted from November 24 – December 12, 2008 and includes the predictions of more than 400 venture capitalists from across the United States.


Credit Crunch 2.0: Institutional Investors Are Not Picking-Up The Cash-Call Anymore; Lots Of Venture Capital Firms Might Not Survive

December 10, 2008
Large investors are out of cash? For Nexit's venture partner, David Aslin, this is the venture capital world's little dirty secret.

Large investors are out of cash? For Nexit's venture partner, David Aslin, this is the venture capital world's little dirty secret.

Talking to several venture capitalists and entrepreneurs over the past couple months, I’ve been wondering when large investors like corporations or mutual funds – also known as “Limited Partners” – will actually stop funding venture capital firms. Well, the time is NOW!

Washington Mutual is the first of these large LPs to default on its commitments to invest in venture capital funds – like the one run by FTVentures – when “called” for the money.

“Yes, an LP will lose most of its past investments and their returns if it doesn’t comply with its commitment and comes up with the money. But it’s not like WaMu had any other choice; it didn’t have any money, it was bankrupt,” explained David Aslin, a Nexit Ventures venture partner.

Young venture capital firms will not survive the downturn

The dirty little secret in our industry is that more “defaults” are coming, predicts Aslin. “And it’s going to impact our industry hard,” added the venture capitalist.

So far, the credit crunch has mostly affected investments in new startups and ideas.

But the sudden drought of institutional capital is affecting VCs as well and in particular the “younger” or newest venture capital firms that plan to be raising money in 2009 or 2010.

“Investors are going to look at firms historical returns; and most likely will not invest in a firm’s Fund 2 or 3 that has very little or no history of success,” pointed Steve Bengston, Pricewaterhouse Coopers’ managing director of emerging company services.

Bengston believes that a lot of VCs will just not be able to survive this down cycle and I unfortunately have to agree with his assessment.


Memo To Silicon Valley: 2009 Is The New 2001, All Deals Are Series A; But VCs Are Hurt Too!

December 9, 2008
Amid the general gloom and doom, Cleantech and Life science companies are doing well, according to PwC managing director, Steve Bergson.

Amid the overall gloom and doom, Cleantech and Life science companies are doing better than their peers in the Tech sector, according to PwC managing director, Steve Bengston.

So the word is finally out. No, not about the recession which everybody in this country – except perhaps the U.S. government – felt since last year when gas prices were going through the roof, but about what’s really happening in the cosy venture capital world of Silicon Valley today: fire sale of startups; cram-downs, slashing startups valuations; venture capitalists layoffs; venture firms closing, etc.

All fund raising are now A-rounds

And for Pricewaterhouse Coopers managing director of emerging company services, Steve Bengston, it’s 2001 all over again. As a result, companies in need to raise additional funds in 2009 will pay a much higher price for it.

“It’s a buyers market. And certainly a great time for venture capitalists that could get their hands on very good companies and technologies at unbelievably cheap valuations, in the single digit! For entrepreneurs, it will not get better until perhaps 3 or 4 years from now,” predicts Bengston, speaking this morning at the SDForum‘s Quarterly Venture breakfast event.

Entrepreneurs and startups are not the only ones feeling the pain. Venture capitalists do too!

“The Limited Partners (LPs) that are funding venture capital firms are complaining of their investments’ poor returns. Firms will then have to layoff their poor performers while others will just shut down because they couldn’t raise their next fund,” adds Bengston.

Although the credit crunch is hurting Silicon Valley more than the previous Internet bubble burst because of its worldwide phenomena, Bengston sees Cleantech and the Life science as “robust” sectors for the years to come.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers