Will Gevo Want $1 Billion To Execute Its Biofuels Strategy?

August 16, 2010

Gevo announced plans to sell $150 million of its stock to the public. Apparently it really needs the money!

The track record for biofuels IPOs has not been good over the years. There is little to suggest it is much changed now. So one would imagine that any money-losing biofuels company – like Gevo – will eventually end up dealing with a restless group of profit-minded shareholders.

So why test the financial markets and risk years of lackluster investor response – similar to what biofuels company Codexis and battery maker A123 have experienced during their public lives so far?

Gevo’s S-1 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday answers that question. It’s called money – perhaps $1 billion of it.

Gevo explains that its ambition is to use the cash it raises from its IPO to buy existing ethanol plants (directly and through joint ventures) and convert them to isobutanol production using the company’s proprietary technology. Gevo’s technology breaks down a variety of feedstocks, such as corn, wheat, sugar cane and cellulosic materials, into sugars using a yeast biocatalyst. A second piece of the process is an isobutanol separations unit that bolts onto an ethanol plant.

Isobutanol is a specialty chemical that substitutes for ethanol and blends with gasoline. It also is used in the production of plastics, rubber, lubricants and polyester.

The company presently has an agreement to acquire one facility, a 22 million gallon plant in Minnesota, which it is to buy for $20.7 million from Agri-Energy. The deal was announced earlier this week.

The company’s long-term goal is to produce more than 500 million gallons of isobutanol by 2014. To that end, Gevo states in its S-1 that, “We may require substantial additional financing to achieve our goals” and “we may seek additional capital through a combination of public and private equity offerings, debt financings, strategic partnerships and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale or issuance of equity, warrants or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a stockholder.”

In other words, prepare for a massive company scale up. Consider this back of the envelope calculation. To reach an annual production target of 500 million gallons, Gevo will need 28 plants similar to the 22 million gallon facility it is buying in Minnesota. That’s because after converting the plant to isobutanol, production will fall to 18 million gallons a year. If one such plant costs $20.7 million, 27 additional plants will cost about $559 million. Add to that conversion costs of about $17 million a plant, or another $459 million. Together the sum is more than $1 billion.

This price tag may be reduced if the company relies on joint ventures. But then so too is its profit potential.

Gevo is not the first biofuels producer to recently target the public financial markets. Amyris filed in April with hopes of raising $100 million, even if it seems in no rush. The company in June raised more than $130 million in additional private capital and struck an equity deal with an affiliate of the French oil and gas giant Total.

PetroAlgae also announced a $200 million IPO this week.

It will be an interesting test in coming months to see how investors feel about funding an industry that is still learning to plant both feet on the ground – and which will need a bunch of money to do so.


The Difficult Bullish Case For Cellulosic Biofuel

June 17, 2010

Biofuel producers have their fingers crossed on several key Washington policy decisions. They may be holding their fingers for some time.

The news from the halls of government wasn’t encouraging on Wednesday. A bill to extend the expired biodiesel tax credit failed in the Senate, a sign that renewing the ethanol credit later this year could also be politically sticky.

The EPA meanwhile balked on a measure to raise the blending cap for ethanol. A decision had been expected in June and now appears more likely by late summer, at the earliest.

About 50 cellulosic ethanol pilot plants operate in the U.S. Several hundred demonstration plants around the world await funding

The uncertainty from these delayed decisions is likely to keep the industry in financial limbo – just as it was hoping for something better. Since the depths of the recession early last year, financing for new plants has been hard to find. Money isn’t likely to flow freely any time soon.

Things could be so different. Cellulosic ethanol is finally coming of age. Technological kinks appear to be working themselves out, and pilot projects are ready to pass the baton to demonstration ones.

As many as several hundred second-generation cellulosic ethanol plants await funding and the certainty of government decisions could help them lock in money.

There is good reason to think they should move ahead, says Poul Ruben Andersen, global marketing director for Novozymes’ bioenergy business. Four cellulosic demonstration plants are in operation (two in the United States and two in Europe) and the results are favorable.

“It is still early days,” says Andersen. But “this makes us confident.” In the U.S., Iogen and Verenium operate facilities, while in Europe Inbicon and Abengoa are demonstrating production. The plants are similar size, each about 1.5 million gallons.

Just as important, the industry believes second-generation costs are coming down. Cellulosic ethanol is more expensive than corn ethanol, which sells at about $1.60 a gallon. Large-scale production should bring it to below $2, or under the comparable price of gasoline.

POET, the largest producer of corn ethanol, says its cellulosic pilot plant in South Dakota (one of about 50 industry-wide in the U.S.) is successful enough that production can move to the demonstration phase. It hopes to begin construction this summer in Iowa. The 25-million-gallon plant will use corncobs and discarded plant material from grain harvesting.

“We will continue to tweak this process and improve it,” says CEO Jeff Broin. For instance, the company is installing a $2 million pretreatment system to better simulate conditions at the demonstration facility It also recently discovered that a second anaerobic digester is more effective at producing power for the plant than a separate boiler.

Yet this next generation of plants requires government certainty before it can take root. A decision on tax credits is one necessary component. Investment credits, loan guarantees and more aggressive production targets also are critical, according to a report released this week by the Union of Concerned Scientists.

At the top of the list is the decision over blending limits. Carmakers worry an increase in the present 10 percent ethanol-gasoline limit could harm engines and catalytic converters. Industry executives hope for 15 percent or more.

At 20 or 22 percent, investors will be upbeat enough to begin funneling money into new demonstration plants, says Andersen. “That would pave the way.”

It also may get production back on track. The EPA had hoped for 100 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol this year, but scaled back the goal to 6.5 million as the realities of the industry became clear. Now it appears the 1 billion gallon mark won’t be hit until 2017, well behind schedule.

Once again, it doesn’t have to be this way. The National Academy of Sciences estimates enough raw material is available to produce 32 billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol, or double the government’s target for 2022. The academy says 400 million tons of biomass can be found each year in the United States from agricultural discards, fuel crops, forest residues and solid wastes.

Unfortunately, a bull-run in cellulosic ethanol doesn’t appear likely in the short term. Analysts continue to expect the technology to get to scale in 2012. At the present pace, this may not be the case.

That suggests industry fingers had better remain crossed.


Silicon Valley Company Turning Beetle Devastated Colorado Forests Into Biofuel

April 7, 2010

The mountain pine beetle is devastating Colorado’s lodgepole pine forests

Now a California company hopes to put these millions of acres of dead and dying trees to good use. Cobalt Technologies of Mountain View says it has come up with a way to turn the tattered forests to biofuel.

The mountain pine beetle has killed millions of trees. Cobalt Technologies wants to turn them into fuel.

The mountain pine beetle, native to North America, has killed millions of trees in northern Colorado, and its infestation has spread to other western states and to other pines, including the ponderosa pine. It is estimated as many as 40 million acres could be infested in British Colmbia.

“If we use only half of the 2.3 million acres currently affected in Colorado alone, we could produce over two billion gallons of bio-butanol — enough to blend into all the gasoline used in Colorado for six years,” claims Cobalt CEO Rick Wilson.

Colorado State University will begin testing whether Cobalt’s bio-butanol, when mixed with gasoline, will be suitable for use in commercial engines.

“Converting beetle-killed pine for biofuels is an extremely difficult process,” says Colorado State University chemical and biological engineering professor Ken Reardon in a Cobalt press release.


Key Test Passed By Second Generation Biofuel Maker ZeaChem

February 2, 2010

In a key test of a second-generation biofuel, ZeaChem is reporting Tuesday that it has proven popular trees can be turned into commercial quantities of ethanol.

ZeaChem proved that it can ferment wood from popular trees into acetic acid, the building block for making ethanol

The Colorado company said three large-scale trials it concluded in January yielded acceptable levels of acetic acid, the fundamental building block for biofuel or specialty chemicals. A commercial scale plant is on target for completion by the end of the year.

The test was the first of a technology that up to now has only been demonstrated in the lab. For that reason, it is another important indication that second-generation biofuels – those made from sources other than food crops – can be produced economically in quantities sufficient enough to impact gasoline demand.

“Our confidence is huge that we can go to the next step,” said Jim Imbler, ZeaChem CEO. “Nobody has scaled this up to this size before.”

ZeaChem’s technology calls for wood from poplar trees to be broken down and fermented using bacteria found in termites and the digestive tracks of horses and goats. It is particularly efficiency because it produces no CO2 and therefore doubles the output of useful, fuel-producing carbon.

The company conducted three separate trials of its process and generated concentrations of acetic acid each time that exceeded 50 grams a liter, a significant milestone, said Imbler. The tests were conducted in a 1,500-gallon tank and took less than 100 hours.

The next step is a 250,000-gallon plant in Boardman, OR. ZeaChem won a $25 million Energy Department grant for the construction of the project.


Using Sound Waves To Extract Biofuel From Algae

January 11, 2010

Late last year, Solix Biofuels stuck a deal to use sound-wave technology from Los Alamos National Laboratories to turn algae into biofuel.

Sound waves are used to levitate water droplets and separate them from the algae.

Now the technology – which levitates water – is slated for field tests at Solix’s Colorado’s demonstration facility.

The novel approach to algae cultivation should reduce the amount of energy needed to harvest oils from algae grown in an aquatic environment. The oils are processed into biodiesel, gasoline and jet fuel.

Los Alamos’ acoustic levitator aids the procedure by lifting water droplets greater than 1 mm in diameter against the force of gravity. This will enable Solix to separate the algae from the water using less energy.

The two organizations stuck a technology relationship in September. According to the Los Alamos, the technology will be installed this year at Solix’s Coyote Gulch Demonstration Facility near Durango.


Clean Tech Boost From Energy Department Stimulus Money Still Not Felt

January 5, 2010

The Obama Administration by way of the Energy Department has awarded $22 billion for clean technology research and project deployment.

Most of this shot in the arm has yet to be felt.

As of Dec. 25, only $1.7 billion has been spent, or 5.3 percent of the total. That means the expected stimulus from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act hasn’t yet arrived.

The slow start for the stimulus spending bodes well for 2010 and for 2011, when greater sums of money should start flowing.

According to the DoE update, another $11 billion in funding could be awarded. So far, spending has been greatest among energy efficiency, renewable energy and environmental management projects.

The department has awarded $21.9 billion of $32.7 billion of authorized funds.


The Case For Biofuel From Giant Miscanthus Grass

December 3, 2009

The Deep South isn’t exactly the renewables capital of the nation.  Only 1,000 homes in South Florida have solar panels, for instance, despite an abundance of sunshine.

One company hopes to turn this desert of energy awareness into a paradigm of bio-energy – and it believes Giant Miscanthus Grass holds the key.

Giant Miscanthus Grass produces 2.5 times more Ethanol per acre than corn.

SunBelt Biofuels calculates that if Georgia were to dedicate 2.4 million acres of cropland to the grass it could become energy self-sufficient. The state has a total of 10 million acres of farmland.

There are reasons to believe SunBelt, which announced Thursday it has begun converting the grass into commercial fuel, has a good case.

Most people think of Giant Miscanthus as an ornamental grass, growing in bright green clumps that can stand 15 feet tall and displaying flat leaves that can measure 1.5 inches across.

What they don’t realize is that it requires less than half the acreage of corn and switchgrass and produces 2.5 times the ethanol. A mature field re-grows in a year, and the grass is tolerant of poor soils and salty, coastal environments.

The grass could be a boon for rural economies, argues SunBelt, bringing Georgia farmers an extra $2 billion in income. No subsidies would be needed.

SunBelt said Thursday it has struck an exclusive licensing deal with Mississippi State University, which has studied the grass for 15 years. Now all it has to do is to convince the global warming disbelievers who continue to nonchalantly drive their SUVs across the Georgia pinelands.


$1 Billion More In Energy Dept Smart Grid Grants Expected Shortly, $800 Million In BioFuel Too

November 17, 2009

The Energy Department is preparing to award another $1 billion in grants to companies developing and deploying smart grid technologies.

The biofuels money will include $450 million for demonstration biorefineries, says DOE's Sanjay Wagle

The grants will be announced soon, along with another $800 million earmarked for companies converting biomass into biofuels, said Sanjay Wagle, renewable energy adviser at the Department of Energy.

Speculation is the smart grid money could be released within the next couple weeks. Already the energy department has doled out $3.4 billion in smart grid funding to 100 projects in an announcement it made late last month.

Wagle, during an appearance at the Dow Jones Alternative Energy Innovations conference in Silicon Valley, declined to say which companies would win the awards.  But he said the grants would focus on encouraging demonstration projects involving utilities and consumers. It is believed California companies may benefit from this second grant announcement more than from the first.

Included in the biofuels funding will be $450 million set aside for demonstration refineries, he said.

The two awards are among the largest grant allocation remaining from $36 billion in recovery act funding the Energy Department has been steering to new energy companies. Eighty-five percent of the funds have now been dispersed, though major loan guarantees and tax credits remain.

Wagle said three new loan guarantees have been approved, but not yet announced. The department’s first loan guarantee of $535 million went to the solar company Solyndra earlier this year.

Another dozen loan guarantee candidates are in the pipeline, he said.


Second Generation Biofuels Still Twice As Expensive As Ethanol

October 21, 2009

America has turned a cold shoulder to ethanol and biodiesel.

Not a single ethanol or biodiesel plant has been funded this year and the prospects for the months ahead don’t look good. More than 1.4 billion gallons of ethanol production capacity sits idle. An additional 590 million gallons of biodiesel output is doing the same.

No ethanol plants have been funded this year in the United States

No ethanol plants have been funded this year in the United States

Second generation biofuels, those made with grasses, wood chips or other non-feed stocks, are finding it equally hard to jumpstart a business. The enzymes necessary to convert raw material into sugars are still evolving and costs are twice those of ethanol, or about $4 a gallon, reports John Jay Brunson, vice president at Industrial Info Resources’ alternatives fuels group.

The race is on to build a profitable, commercial biofuels industry in the United States. Unfortunately, no one seems to be winning.

The federal government is hoping to bring new energy to the market. It recently awarded $358 million in grants to six second-generation, or cellulosic, fuel companies. One of them, Verenium announced on Wednesday a trial attempt to produce biofuels from the residue of paper processing.

In addition, 35 other pilot plants are under construction in the U.S. with capital spending of about $3.3 billion, says Industrial Info.

With the ethanol market saturated with product and high-cost hurdles facing second generation biofuels, the government’s goal of 16 billion gallons a year in little more than a decade seems awfully far off.

Clearly a cost breakthrough and new distribution infrastructure is needed. So too are lower prices for E-85, or ethanol burning, cars.

A lot of pain is ahead if the country is to run on biofuel.


Biofuels And Liquid Coal Will Not Wean The US Off Oil

October 1, 2009

A massive biofuels development effort costing billions of dollars and requiring the erection of 400 refining plants won’t wean the United States off its addiction to gasoline.

That is the conclusion of a National Academy of Sciences study finished earlier the year and presented at Stanford University late Wednesday. The study, which examined the growth of the biofuels and liquid-coal industries over the next 25 years, said at best they could supply a quarter of the country’s transportation needs by 2035.

Biofuels and liquid coal could produce a quarter of the nations transportation fuels, says Michael Ramage

Biofuels and liquid coal could produce a quarter of the nation's transportation fuels, says Michael Ramage

By that time, the nation would be producing 2 to 3 million barrels of bio- and liquid-coal fuels a day. The country presently consumes 12 million barrels of oil a day for transportation.

“It may not sounds like a lot, but it is a lot,” said Michael Ramage, a retired ExxonMobile executive and chair of the committee producing the report. But “biomass is no panacea,” adds fellow committee member James Sweeney, director of the Precourt Institute for Energy Efficiency at Stanford.

The study’s sobering message comes as something of a surprise. Earlier examinations of the biofuels industry projected the supply of raw biomass, from which the fuel is fermented, to be roughly twice as large as the National Academy of Science’s estimate. The new work also anticipates much higher costs than previously expected.

Perhaps more than anything, the report highlights the enormity of task ahead of the nation as it remakes the carbon economy. Its conclusions add evidence to the belief that substantial efforts on many parallel technologies will be necessary to promote renewable fuel and combat global warming.

It also suggests that the transportation market place in the U.S. will get substantially more complex – with competing technologies and delivery infrastructures – leaving behind the “quaint” old days of a single gasoline-driven distribution network.

The study found that by 2035, biofuels still will be an expensive option – roughly equivalent to a $100 a barrel oil. Oil is selling at $68 a barrel or so today.

But the fuels would – assuming a project 30 percent improvement in the efficiency of the internal combustion engine – reduce CO2 emissions and cut America’s demand for imported oil in half.

Despite its reservations, the study ignores one potential wildcard. It does not consider the possibility that biofuel can be economically and efficiently developed from algae, which some scientists say is the nation’s best hope.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers