Lithium Could Be The Oil Of The 21st Century

March 25, 2010

That’s the question Erik Bethel asks in a new study of the electric-vehicle and consumer-electronics markets. His answer is an emphatic yes, and his advice to China is to hurriedly make deals to lock up South America reserves, where 75 percent of the known deposits lie.

Lithium demand for electric car batteries could well outstrip worldwide production. That's not considering consumer electronics.

He could be right about China. But what is most certain is this: Lithium could remake the global economy in the unfolding century in much the same way oil brought economic power to the U.S. and Western economies during the last.

This time around, the economic dislocation may be more equalitarian than it was in the past 100 years.

Already international companies are staking claims in Chile and Argentina, where the metal is being mined. Companies such as Toyota and Orocobre of Australia have put money down. Magna International of Canada, which supplies Ford, has reached into its pocket as well.

In Bolivia, which is often unfriendly to outside investment, test mines are being dug.

The U.S. has warm relationships with Chile, the world’s largest producer, so there is no suggestion access by American firms will be blocked. The question will be price. And that is important because this time it seems clear the U.S. will not be able to rely on its modest lithium deposits in Nevada and in North Carolina, where extraction is presently too expensive.

Yet the biggest wild card may be China itself, which has the world’s fourth largest deposits. What most people don’t know is that China has known reserves of lithium in easy to mine salt-lake deposits in Qinghai Province and Tibet, notes Bethel in his new study. Its total reserves of 2.7 million tons are almost equal to Chile’s.

China has the fourth largest lithium reserves in the world. (Source: SinoLatin Capital)

The challenge for the nation is development since the silvery metal with better energy intensity than nickel lies in remote areas with little infrastructure, says Bethel. Train lines and highways need to be built. However, China’s ambitions in electric car manufacturing certainly make development and investment abroad seem likely.

That will put pressures on the U.S. The Department of Energy is pouring billions of dollars in the battery and electric car companies. In California alone 12 different manufacturers are designing electric and hybrid cars – including Tesla Motors and Fisker – hoping to out maneuver the Big Three, which also have cars on their drawing boards.

But seeking the lithium to make enough batteries is going to become expensive. Optimistic estimates suggest there could be as many as 6 million electric and hybrid cars in use around the world by 2018. Their batteries will require approximately 18,000 tons of lithium, or more than the entire global output in 2008. This doesn’t even take into account a rapidly expanding consumers electronics industry.

Demand is ready to skyrocket. Price, too

During the last century, the U.S fueled its growth with plentiful oil. This time around, the lithium is not.


GE Targets The Solar Market And Sales Leader First Solar

March 18, 2010

GE shook up the solar market Thursday by announcing plans to develop a line of thin-film solar panels using the cadmium-telluride material that has given First Solar its market lead.

GE said it would rely on cadmuim teluride technology from PrimeStar Solar, in which it hold a majority share

The manufacturing giant said its products would benefit from the cost advantage thin-film has maintained over the traditional polysilicon used by many Chinese makers. Panels are expected in the market by 2011.

The company said it is working with PrimeStar Solar, a cadmium telluride start-up in which it holds a majority ownership.

GE’s return to solar – it at one time produced crystalline silicon cells – appears to have been delayed a year by the global downturn. But its commitment to thin film appeared strong, despite recent industry skepticism that thin film will be able to keep up with polysilicon cells, which continue to make efficiency improvements.

Some polysilicon manufacturers now boast of laboratory cells operating at 19 percent efficiencies and greater compared with the 11 percent or so from thin film.

“After having competed an exhaustive survey of the PV landscape, we determined that thin films were the optimum path for GE,” said the company’s solar R&D leader Danielle Merfeld. The company’s product development will take place in Colorado, New York, China and India.

GE intends to market to utilities rather than consumers.


The US Is In Danger Of Losing The Clean Tech Race, Says Energy Secretary Chu

March 8, 2010

The United States risks losing the race to a clean-tech economy if it fails to get serious about global warming, Energy Department Secretary Steven Chu said Monday.

Taking five years or longer to pass energy legislation will limit the nation’s ability to be a leader in the green-energy technologies of tomorrow, Chu said during an address at Stanford University.

American prosperity is at stake, said Energy Secretary Steven Chu.

“I think we will lose (and) end up purchasing equipment from abroad,” he said. “The future prosperity of the United States is at risk.”

Chu used the midday speech to renew his call for an energy bill from Congress. But he also highlighted the danger more motivated countries, particularly China, pose to a complacent country.

China is spending $9 billion a month to diversify its energy production, he noted. One advanced power line project by itself will cost $88 billion over the next decade as high-efficiency high-tension wires are strung 1,200 miles from east to west. The wires will transport energy to the coastal population centers with miniscule energy losses of as little as 5 percent.

In 1996, the U.S. was the leading manufacturer of solar panels. Now its market share is below 10 percent, Chu added. “We are falling behind in the clean-energy race.”

He argued that the importance of energy legislation can’t be overstated. A properly crafted bill will set a price on carbon and a cap on permitted emissions, giving companies the clarity to begin making investments. Even a modest bill can provide an important signal to the market, he said

That Obama Administration has made the goal of energy legislation a top priority. Chu hoped to push the effort along: “I would like to have it this year.”

But the nation needs more than legislation. The Recovery Act passed at the start of the Obama Administration set aside $80 billion for clean technology development. However, many of the grants and tax credits it included have been allocated.

More money will be needed, Chu said. “We still need tens of billions of dollars at a minimum a year. The Recovery Act was a start of that.”

Chu said the future prosperity of the country hangs in the balance. So does the U.S.’s first climate change counter punch, a long awaited first blow.


China Leading US In Green Energy

February 17, 2010

Last year, 92 billion was spent building solar parks, wind farms and biofuels plants. China, not the United States, was the leader.

China increased its spending on wind farms 27 percent last year. Spending in the Americas fell 25 percent.

China by itself spent $21.8 billion on new wind facilities, a 27 percent jump from 2008. Spending in the Americas fell 25 percent.

The world’s most populous nation also nearly doubled its out lays on solar parks to $1.9 billion. Globally, financing for solar plants was down 5 percent.

A similar trend guided venture capital investing. Clean-tech investing in the U.S. came to $2.6 billion last year, while investing overseas added up to $3 billion. The U.S. spending was off 50 percent as the recession froze financial decision-making. Investments abroad were off by one-third.

While U.S. investors slowly get back on their feet and uninformed Republicans question the science behind global warming, the moneymen in China are spending at a smart pace.

It will likely give that nation an advantage in the years to come.


Tough Ride For Solar Market Will Continue In 2010

January 12, 2010

The solar market was a tough ride in 2009. It could be more tumultuous this year.

That’s because so much of the industry’s sales are tied up in one country – Germany – and subsidized Chinese manufacturers are cutting prices so deeply that competing is nearly impossible.

In a worst case scenario, solar shipments this year could fall below those in 2009, says analyst Paula Mints

The result could be falling sales in 2010 if German policy makers cut the country’s generous feed-in tariff, says Paula Mints, principal analyst at Navigant Consulting.

Mints, who spoke at the Industry Strategy Symposium in Half Moon Bay, said she estimates solar manufacturers shipped 5 GW of panels in 2009. Under the worse case scenario (a dramatic cut in the German subsidy), that could fall to 4.1 GW this year.

A more hopeful outlook with little or no cut from Germany could lead an upswing of 5.5 GW of shipments.

The difficulty hinges on the reality that Germany accounts for 58 percent of sales (76 percent for Europe as a whole). Sure, China is a booming market as the government tries to stimulate domestic purchases, and India is on the rise, too. Demand in the United States also should grow, though not at an explosive rate until 2011.

So what happens in Germany dictates the health of the solar market. So, too, do manufacturers in China, which have been selling panels at almost breakeven. About 52% of solar panels come from China and “prices were so low it was impossible to compete with them” last year, says Mints.

As a result, the industry’s profit margin fell almost 10 percent in 2009 after rising for four years. From a pure revenue perspective, “it will take this industry at least three years to recover and be above 2008” levels, says Mints.

Until then, the tough ride will continue. That is unless the U.S. market takes off earlier than expected. “We need for the U.S. to become a top market for the whole industry to keep moving forward,” she says. “We can’t keep relying on Europe.”


Overcapacity In China Could Lead To Cheap Solar Cells And Wind Turbines

December 30, 2009

Manufacturing overcapacity in China could lead to lower prices for wind turbines and polycrystalline silicon.

Wind turbine makers are projected to use just 50% of factory capacity in 2010

According to a report by the National Development and Reform Commission, excess capacity is a growing concern among many manufacturing sectors in China, from steel to aluminum to methanol. The nation’s producers of polycrystalline silicon, the raw material for making thin-film solar cells, are a case in point. They were using only 20 percent of their capacity.

Wind turbine and equipment maker fare better. They are projected to be using 50 percent in 2010.

In both cases, an effort by the state to create jobs and put factories to work would increase supply and pressure world prices.

Excess capacity has been an issue in China for years. For instance, the nation used just 76 percent of its steel making capacity in 2008 and 73 percent of its aluminum making facilities.

So far, this under utilization has not pulled the rug out from under the domestic economy. Rapid growth covers up many ills by stimulating employment and permitting inefficient manufacturers to survive. This may continue, even as some facilities go off line, though China has been unwilling to mothball even its oldest factories.

The manufacturing capacity of wind equipment and poly-silicon in particular could be soaked up by China’s unfolding plans to sharply expand alternative energy generation.

But China is an export driven economy. So at some level production is supported by purchases abroad. That can only mean one thing: excess supply and lower prices.


China Seeks Hegemony In Solar

November 24, 2009

China’s solar intentions are nothing short of world dominance – industrial hegemony in manufacturing, distribution and generation.

This seems evident on a number of levels as the nation’s planned economy and entrepreneurial spirit appear aimed at the same target.

From polysilicon manufacturing to solar farm installation, China wants to be the world's full-service solar store

Domestically numerous solar projects are being unveiled by one corporate subsidy or another. The internal Chinese solar market is expected to increase as much as six fold in 2010 to as much as 1.5 GW from 250 MW this year, according to an estimate from FBR Capital Markets. (It was only 70 MW in 2008.)

Government officials have recently approved 294 solar projects at a cost of $2.9 billion over several years. More are on the way. In total, they add up so far to 642 MW, only a sliver of the country’s projected annual production capacity of 4.5 GW.

That means looking abroad, even while construction at home is running at full steam.

This was evident in Tuesday’s announcement from GCL-Poly that it accepted a $710 million investment from a subsidiary of the state-owned China Investment Corp. According to FBR, GCL-Poly has already hired a San Francisco team eager to build farms in the United States.

In its sights are 300 MW of projects in the U.S. and Europe for potential investment, says FBR.

The challenge at least internally for Chinese companies is that domestic contracts have slim margins. Feed-in tariffs are low in China and government subsidies cover only about 50 percent of construction. This suggests money will need to be made abroad to fuel the industry.

Perhaps that is why the expansion fuse is burning so quickly.


Chinese Power Grab: Wind Energy Typhoon Continues This Year

November 3, 2009

China has added wind energy at a shocking pace this year, despite the slowing global economy.

Chinese wind farm construction maintains a rapid pace

The country added 93 wind farms through the first three quarters of 2009, according to Industrial Info Resources. That brought generating capacity of 15.9 GW. Another 5 GW is possible by the end of the year.

The nation is catapulting itself to a global leader. At the end of 2008, it was number four in the world with 12 GW of capacity. That position isn’t likely to last. The target is to reach 300 GW by 2010 and 1,000 GW by 2020.

Analysts say the expansion of wind energy has been 100 percent annually over the past three years.

It also has been benefiting local companies. The country has required that 70 percent of wind turbine components be produced in Chinese factories.


China Shows Wind Turbine Swagger As Local Company Expects World Dominance

October 29, 2009

General Electric and Siemens are aggressively trying to steal the top spot in the wind turbine industry from Denmark’s Vestas Wind Systems.

China's Sinovel Wind hopes to be number one in the world in five years, says AMSC's Greg Yurek

But so are China’s emerging suppliers. And with the domestic Chinese market a captive playground, they have reason to be confident.

More evidence of this confidence was apparent in Greg Yurek’s discussion Thursday of Sinovel Wind Co.’s prospects. Yurek, CEO of American Superconductor, supplies electrical components to China-based Sinovel and held a second-quarter conference call to detail his company’s strong financial results.

He said the growth was in large part due to his business with Sinovel and that more expansion will follow.

Sinovel supplied 23 percent of the Chinese market in 2008 and so far this year captured 40 percent of orders. That should make it the fifth largest supplier of wind turbines in the world, he said. The company aims to be number one in the world in five years, said Yurek, who met with Sinovel leaders during a trip to China last week.

The company has already begun to ship internationally and is setting up operations in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Because of American Superconductor’s Sinovel contract, “all signs appear upward for our wind power systems,” he said. The signs also appear to be pointing up for China.


Larry Ellison On The Econony: U.S. Consumers Broke; No Recovery Ahead

October 6, 2009
Oracle chief wants to impose tariffs on goods originating from China and India

Oracle chief wants to impose tariffs on goods originating from China and India

The Oracle co-founder and CEO Larry Ellison has a dismal view on the future of the U.S. economy and sees no recovery in sight.

“Somebody said it’s going to be an L-shaped recovery: down, not coming back. I believe that,” said the software executive.

Ellison argues that the U.S. consumer is so deeply in debt that the economy will not come back at least before 5-years; during which the U.S. economy will not be the world’s engine of growth as used to be, while U.S. consumers start saving to pay off their debts.

The Oracle CEO also expects a higher tax regime to pay for some of the Obama’s administration initiatives.

“I’m surprised that there are so many huge spending programmes, like the stimulus package ($800 billion), the health-care bill ($1 trillion), cap and trade ($1 billion)… There are a lot of things that is going on right now that make me believe that we’re not going to have a rapid recovery,” adds Ellison.

Follows, is the video excerpt of Larry Ellison on the state of the economy:

Oracle CEO favours tariffs on imported goods from India and China

Ellison also explained that the U.S. should impose tariffs on imported goods along with its decision to adopt the cap and trade programme.

“Because you can’t suddenly say that energy is going to be very expensive in the U.S. which would send manufacturing overseas and without having tariffs on things coming back to the U.S. for countries like India and China who said very clearly that they have no interest in monitoring their CO2 output until they have the same per capita CO2 output as the U.S… As a results, China will be able to increase their CO2 output by a factor of 4,” adds Ellison.

Follows another video excerpt where the Oracle CEO talks about imposing tariffs on goods coming from India and China:


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers