Cellulosic Ethanol Gains Environmentalist Support But Researchers Find First Parasites

April 2, 2010

Ethanol-based biofuel still faces plenty of hurdles.

Most of the fuel continues to be derived from corn in the United States and sugar cane in Brazil. This concentration is sparking concerns that U.S. agricultural land is shifting from food to fuel production at a time when developing countries still struggle to feed themselves. The problem will only worsen as ethanol plants expand to generate the vast volumes needed to make a dent in gasoline demand.

University of Illinois researchers found contamination in 85 samples of switchgrass and Miscanthus taken in six states

Adding to the travails are fears that developing countries will clear cut forests to replace the corp-bearing land lost in the U.S. and Europe to biofuel agriculture.

This is motivating groups such as the National Wildlife Federation to oppose corn-based biofuels. This week the federation urged Congress to favor second-generation cellulosic ethanol and asked for the elimination of tax incentives supporting corn farmers.

Not so fast! Cellulosic ethanol development is proceeding at a fast pace. Numerous companies are building pilot plants to ferment fuel from popular trees, switchgrass and other non-edible plants. But what they haven’t counted on is an explosion of plant parasite and other tiny organisms interested in feeding on these potentially lucrative fuel sources.

Late last month, the University of Illinois researchers reported they discovered the first parasite to appear in biofuel crops – in this case switchgrass and Miscanthus.

“Diseases and pests have the potential to cause significant constraints on biomass production, putting the crops at risk for reductions in biomass yield and quality,” said lead researcher and post-doctoral associate Tesfamariam Mekete.

The researchers looked at 37 samples of Miscanthus and 48 samples of switchgrass from Illinois, Iowa, Georgia, Kentucky, South Dakota and Tennessee. All the samples were contaminated.

“The high levels of nematodes found in our survey and the damage symptoms observed in infected roots suggest parasitism may contribute to the decline of biomass production,” Mekete said in a university publication.

Corn farmers, After decades of modern agriculture, know what to expect from pests and parasite. Cellulosic cultivation is still new. Time will tell whether farmers are prepared for the unexpected.


The Case Against Corn Based Ethanol Keeps Building

March 12, 2010

The case for corn-based ethanol keeps getting murkier.

The Obama Administration tried to stake out a middle ground last month when the EPA softened its threshold for acceptable biofuel. Instead of looking at the indirect impact of growing corn ethanol – i.e. the destruction of forests elsewhere in the world to prepare land for agriculture – the EPA approved the use of ethanol from modern, gas-fired refineries.

However, the evidence against this deliberate caving to the farm lobby keeps building.

This week, an analysis from Purdue University reinforced the EPA’s original stance: that corn-based ethanol is unlikely to reduce global greenhouse gases.

The university looked at ecological evidence and commodity trading data to reach its conclusion. It found that substituting ethanol for gasoline would double greenhouse gas emissions by changing land use in 18 regions of the world.

Chloregy released a second comprehensive analysis that points to ethanol’s failings. It noted that the price for corn rose 105 percent in the past five years aided by a 54-cent-a-gallon tariff on ethanol imported from Brazil, the other big biofuel making country. The tariff shields ethanol from competition, since Brazilian sugar-cane ethanol can be made for half the price of corn.

The high prices give added incentive to farmers around the world to clear land and plant corn. Adding to the ecological is that corn requires large amounts of nitrogen-base fertilizer. The consequence is an increase in the release of nitrous oxide, a more damaging greenhouse gas than CO2.

Presently, more than a third of the nation’s corn harvest goes to making ethanol. This should rise to 50 percent in five years, says the study, released on Thursday.

In a perfect world, this unsustainable trend should be enough to lead the Obama Administration to rethink its policy, the study argues. Unfortunately, the farm lobby won’t permit it. Instead of turning the focus to more ecologically sound second-generation cellulosic ethanol, the corn-based lobby will fight. Let’s hope market forces help turn the tables in the next few years as cellulosic refineries get up and running.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers