IPTV Customers Found Satisfied With Their Service

February 19, 2009

U.S. consumers getting television over the Internet from Verizon and AT&T report being very satisfied with their service, according to a study conducted by Strategy Analytics.

More Than 80%Of FiOs and U-Verse customers report being very or extremely satisfied

More Than 80%Of FiOs and U-Verse customers report being very or extremely satisfied

The survey, completed in late 2008, highlights the competition developing in the American television delivery market as cable companies face challenges to their long-held monopolies. Both Verizon and AT&T have extended fiber-optic networks into local neighborhoods and provided high-speed broadband connections along with scores of digital television channels.

Strategy Analytics said it contacted 845 digital television subscribers, including some who received service from cable companies Comcast, Cox and Time Warner Cable and others who were customers of DirecTV and Dish.

More than 80 percent of subscribers to Verizon’s FiOS and AT&T’s U-Verse said they were extremely or very satisfied with their provider.

Digital television appears to be the greatest lure of the “triple play” offerings telecos developed to bundle TV, phone service and Internet connections, Strategy Analytics said.

Cable subscribers were the least happy with their service, with Time Warner customers most likely to switch.

Today’s television market place is becoming more complicated as consumers increasingly look to the Internet for content and avoid paying a cable or telecom provider.


Cox To Launch Cellphone Service Next Year; Here’s Why It Will Fail !

October 27, 2008

Cox Communications, announced today it will build a cellular network to offer its 6.2 million residential and commercial customers a cellphone service next year. The privately-held cable company operates in 28 major markets across the U.S., including Phoenix, New Orleans, central Florida, Rhode Island, Connecticut and Las Vegas.

Cox explained that it already spent more than $500 million in wireless spectrum licenses, infrastructure and people so that subscribers can use their mobile phones to program their DVRs (digital video recorders), watch TV programs and access content stored on their home PCs.

Can’t we already do all that with, let’s say an iPhone or a Windows-mobile phone? It’s just nuts to build a new old wireless infrastructure to just that. And in this economy! Or it’s just incompetence. More on that later.

Now here are 3 reasons why this project will ultimately fail – I had to limit myself otherwise this post will take the whole front page!

  1. The Network. Cox chose the CDMA technology for its wireless infrastructure. CDMA is doomed, over, kaput. The 2 CDMA operators in the U.S., Verizon and Sprint, are moving away from it for their 4G network: one chose the LTE standard and the other WiMax, respectively.
  2. The Phones. Handset manufacturers are also focusing on 3G or 4G technologies for their next-generation phones. So what does it mean? The CDMA phones will be all but crappy old phones while the cool iPhone-like devices will be on the other newer and faster networks.
  3. The Company. Cox has zero expertise in running a wireless voice and/or data network. I guess that’s why they chose CDMA as their “core” technology”. That’s also why Cox’s bigger rivals, Comcast and Time-Warner, chose to partner with Sprint instead of also doing it alone.

Believe me, this thing will fail miserably. Or perhaps it’s just a joke. Yeah, that’s it, it’s just a big joke to get some conversation going with the other cable companies, Sprint and T-Mobile.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers