Skype Not Available on Android Market? Get Tango!

October 4, 2010

Skype is still not available on most Android phones

The Skype application is still missing in action for most Android users.

After a private screening of the movie “The Social Network” on Friday in Redwood City, I chat with someone from Skype that assured me the VOIP application was already available for my phone.

At that point, I though that it was game over for Palo Alto, Calif.-startup Tango that just launched at GigaOM’s Mobilize conference, a Skype-like app for smartphones (Android and iPhones) which does audio and video calls over the data network (3G or WiFi).

But when I checked back this morning to do a Skype call with my Android phone (Nexus One on T-Mobile), I realised the Skype app is still only available to Android phones on the Verizon network. Bummer!

So I decided to try out Tango for my all my VOIP calls and have fun with the video calling feature that is, in many ways similar to the Apple iPhone 4 FaceTime video phone call application… but for the rest of us! More on Tango later.

Skype better get its act together, sooner rather than later. Because, although it takes 2 to Tango, Skype might just not be part of the dance for very much long!


[Video] H-P To Expand Palm Smartphone Lineup; Extend WebOS To Printers, Netbooks

August 26, 2010

Inspite media reports, HP has no plans to shelve Palm smartphones.

“On the contrary,” insists Tim Pettitt, Palm’s senior product manager of smartphones at a briefing today in San Francisco, Calif. “Palm is going to be the mobility play for HP!”

Expect to see more smartphones coming from HP/Palm as well new mobile devices such as tablets/slates, printers and netbooks, all powered by the company’s mobile operating system, WebOS.

“Our goal is really to expand the form factor. We built WebOS to go on any device. So we knew we’re going to move off smartphones eventually… So definitely you’ll keep seeing things new coming out from Palm.”

It’ll be interesting to see if HP/Palm is able to break in the smartphone market, today dominated by Apple’s iPhone, Google Android and RIM. But you can forget about Nokia. The Finnish company just doesn’t get mobile Internet.


Will The U.S. Generate Too Much Energy? Vinod Khosla Thinks So

August 12, 2010

The potential for clean-tech innovation is so great you might be wise to expect the unexpected. What about an energy glut?

This was the prediction of rock star venture capitalist Vinod Khosla during a panel discussion Tuesday. The event at Google’s Silicon Valley campus was held to discuss the implications of California’s Proposition 23, an attempt to rollback the state’s ambitious climate legislation.

But Khosla stole the show with his outlook for the clean-tech innovation and energy use. “In 10 to 15 years, we will be shutting down (power) plants” because of an excess of electricity in this country, Khosla said. There is an “infinite” opportunity for technological innovation.

Such an upbeat outlook is no surprise from a man whose venture firm, Khosla Ventures, is an active clean-tech investor. Khosla said his firm is backing companies that hope to cut energy use in lighting and data center server racks by 80 percent.

He is equally upbeat about prospects for the United States over China – not always the prevailing wisdom these days. “I won’t say China is winning the clean-tech race,” he says. “But they are clearly paying a lot more attention to the race.”

Here are several other observations from the panel:

*Asked if there was an advantage to creating companies in Silicon Valley rather than China, Khosla was emphatic. “No question about it.” The people are here. The markets are here.

*Nuclear power no longer has an advantage over renewables, he added. There hasn’t been a nuclear plant build in recent years that can beat $7,000 a kilowatt. That makes wind and solar (in some parts of the world) competitive, he says.

*Proposition 23 is a threat because it will kill the clean-energy markets California’s A.B. 32 created. Both Khosla and Google Green Energy Czar William Wiehl concur on this point. Proposition 23, which will go to the ballot in November, would suspend A.B. 32 until the state’s unemployment rate drops to 5.5 percent or less for four consecutive quarters. Texas oil companies Valero and Tesoro back the measure. A.B. 32 sets reporting guidelines for polluters, establishes a statewide limit for carbon and guides emissions back to 1990 levels by 2020.

*A.B. 32 has helped create 500,000 clean-tech jobs in California, Wiehl says.

*Google, adds Wiehl, has made strides with energy efficiency. The company builds its own data centers and servers. As a result, data center energy use is one half of what it would be if the company followed industry-standard best practices, he said.

*As to the next “Google.” “There is no doubt in my mind we will see 10 of these” in clean tech, says Khosla. “Today California has the pole position to win that race.”


Is The Google-Verizon Deal Against Net Neutrality?

August 5, 2010

The debate over the struggle to keep the Net open continues as Google eyes Web traffic deal with Verizon.

Today the New York Times came in strongly against the search engine provider accusing both Google and Verizon are on the verge of signing an agreement for speedier content deliver.

The agreement would let Verizon accelerate content delivery to consumers provided that online publishers pay for it.

By publishers, we are talking of services like YouTube, who would get priority over others when it comes to content delivery over the Verizon Network. A network, by the way, that is amongst one of the top Internet service providers in the United States. The payment will be made by the owner of the content, Google in this case.

The flip side? Wave goodbye to net neutrality.

Here are some reasons why I think this could prove harmful for the rest of us:

  1. Consumers will get charged extra for faster content delivery;
  2. Preference to one content over another on the basis of one being free and the other being paid for;
  3. It would mean an end to the FCC control over Internet Service Providers (ISPs), which I know some wouldn’t mind that much!

In addition, quite a few Verizon phones run on Google’s Android mobile operating system, which further gives credence to speculations that Google might try to seek preferred treatment from Verizon.

In response, Verizon stated this on its blog:

The NYT article regarding conversations between Google and Verizon is mistaken.  It fundamentally misunderstands our purpose. As we said in our earlier FCC filing, our goal is an Internet policy framework that ensures openness and accountability, and incorporates specific FCC authority, while maintaining investment and innovation. To suggest this is a business arrangement between our companies is entirely incorrect.

While Google response on the Guardian was:

The New York Times is quite simply wrong. We have not had any conversations with Verizon about paying for carriage of Google traffic. We remain as committed as we always have been to an open internet.

The deal in my opinion is about winning extra bandwidth to promote better utilization of speed and improved content delivery. Improved speed and higher bandwidth would bolt users with higher service rate and ensure the Internet is monopolized.

Is Google finally evil?


Microsoft Plays The CryBaby While Google And Yahoo Japan Zip A Deal

July 30, 2010

Remember how Microsoft rejoiced having a deal with Yahoo USA last year after all the brouhaha? Its desperate attempt to become a minor number two in the search market competing with Google. Almost everyone was after Google like a pack of wolves to ensure the search giant wouldn’t sniff a deal with Yahoo and it continues to date. At least with Microsoft.

Google has struck an advertising deal with Yahoo Japan and that is hurting Microsoft. Why? I think don’t need to elaborate and my post yesterday on Google’s absolute dominance of the Search Market. With Google signing this deal, it would further solidify its position [though it really doesn’t need this]. However it would greatly benefit Yahoo, given that it will be leveraging Google’s dominance in both search and the ad market and it will most definitely not harm the Microsoft – Yahoo partnership but the Redmond, Washington based software provider has all the issues and things to worry about. A couple of those are:

It will severely damage a healthy competition for search

Google would become the dominant supplier of Ads in Japan for an indefinite period

These can be legitimate concerns but we have seen that Japan’s Fair Trade Commission has given a green signal to this deal. This is unlike the troubles Google faced when the Justice Department called the Yahoo – Google partnership in the US to be anti-competitive. That is just a tale Microsoft would continue to cry over given it has failed itself at search and what ever little respect it could have mustered by cementing a more global partnership with Yahoo. Yahoo Japan on the other hand is steering clear of the fight between number 1 and number 3 in search business stating that Yahoo will use Google’s search technology but would keep its advertising business separate.

I feel a bit sorry for Microsoft though, the heads must be cursing a missed opportunity and being outmaneuvered by Google. Can’t Google give in a small percentage of search share to Microsoft, as charity?


Google Dominates Search Market Where Competitors Are Too Tiny To Be David!

July 29, 2010

When you talk about dominance, numbers speak louder than pages of reports written. Google, the name itself defines a Goliath in the search market and latest numbers seal its reputation. The search giant shares a gargantuan 90.5% of the market share and an even mind boggling 98.29% mobile search market share.

The numbers leave very less for the competitors in the arena, which includes Yahoo, Bing and others less notable search providers. the numbers are as follows for others:

Yahoo: 3.91% Search Market Share – and 0.8% Mobile search market share.

Microsoft Bing: 3.74% Search Market- and 0.46% Mobile search Share

The graph explains a whole lot more than I can ever express: an absolute dominance of Google over everyone else. The data compiled by Pingdom takes both the non-mobile search and the mobile search shares and the red bar isn’t the summed up data of both.

What is to learn for others here? First and foremost: you can’t beat Google, not now and not in the future. The reason for this superiority? Early adoption and emphasis on one category: search, you won’t find Google trying interactive pages, awesome background pictures, integrating all sorts of useless stuff on the main search page and making Google.com a destination/portal. That is exactly what people have loved about it, when they visit Google they are sure of doing what they are on the site for: Search unlike Yahoo for once. I can’t recall when was the last time I visited Yahoo.com for anything? It is flooded with all sorts of crap and search is just one aspect of it.

All in all, Google and search are synonymous to each other and despite all sorts of [legal] troubles Google has been into, it has been the best with what it started off with; plain old search.


Is Google Set To Fail In China?

July 24, 2010

Google might be firing at all cylinders when it comes to gargantuan search shares. But in China, the search giant has some problems, losing out to the dominant local engine, Baidu. The figures state that Google’s search share fell from its previous 71.1 percent to 69.7 percent [source], a huge plunge given that the duration for that drop was only three months.

All that affect has primarily come due to its failure to get a grip in China, a massive Internet market, which if summed up, hasn’t been successfully tapped by anyone from the West. Google, is no exception. In my opinion, the search market, or any other as a matter of fact is on the verge or has reached saturation and 71.1 percent was the maximum Google would have reached. However the much newer and rapidly expanding Asian markets are still untapped and the Silicon Valley is finding it nearly impossible to penetrate these. At least China for sure, of course the country has a huge firewall all around it which ensures that the only thing that gets through is what the ruling body thinks should otherwise there is a huge Block ready to keep you out.

Baidu currently holds 4.6 percent in the global search market, which is just shy of Microsoft with 4.8 percent and Yahoo with 5.6 percent.

Of course Google is still the most popular search destination for anyone online,but its recent tactics to deal with the strict censorship in China have to a large extent backfired. That included the termination of Google.cn earlier this year as well as threatening to pull out of China. If I were Google, I wouldn’t do that for the huge market it is. Lets say if only half of the 1.3 billion people in China have access online in the next couple of years and all they have is Baidu, I bet Google’s dominant position would be challenged big time.

Well it will at least be zeroed out in China for all times to come.


Financial Roundup: Apple Soars, Google Pays Lobbyists $1.34 Million

July 21, 2010

The last couple of days have been interesting, especially related to Apple and it’s Antennagate dilemma and stellar quarter that bamboozled people at Wall Street all the way to Google’s Q2 earning today.

It is interesting to draw comparison how the two have done in the financial scenario. Apple boasting heavy earnings while Google siding more with spending revenue on lobbying. That is quite less surprising, given how the search giant has been caught up resolving legal issues, etc.

Coming to Apple first, the third quarter broke all past records with a massive revenue worth $15.7 billion with net profits flying past $3.25 billion. No one at Apple or at Wall Street had estimated such returns, which are higher and better than how Apple has done during the holiday seasons as well. A summary on what made those numbers possible is:

  • 3.47 Million Macs sold
  • 8.4 million iPhones
  • 9.41 million iPods
  • 3.27 Million iPads (a fresh product)

Of all those numbers, only the iPhone sales have gone down from 8.75 Million to 8.4 Million and the iPods sales continue to fall, which isn’t surprising. The main reason is that Apple has been releasing new products, so people usually wait for the 3Gs or the iPhone 4, instead.

As for the iPod, I personally think it has become quite a useless device, given that all features are already included in the iPhone, which has more uses and is far more powerful. However, the sales of Macs and the very new iPad have done an impressive business. Apple, despite its current hunched approach towards issues manages to deliver great products that keep the company on top of the line and enjoys a great reputation amongst its lovers.

And now, for Google. The search giant continues its efforts to please officials, who are otherwise almost always running after it. In the current quarter, the search engine has spent over $1.34 Million for the same cause, which is around 40% higher than what it spent in Q2 2009. The lobbying efforts aren’t just confined to search, Google is also pushing on the accelerator on reforms for patents, security issues associated to cloud based computing, data privacy, censorship, etc. That is not the end of the story, the search goliath has been after third parties to assist it with the lobbying efforts. Some of those include:

  • Will DeVries: Who worked for Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr as an attorney before he joined Google in 2010 as policy counsel.
  • Robert Tai: Employed previously at Business Software Alliance as a manager of Cyber Crime Prevention and in the Research Division of California Governor’s office before joining Google in 2007.
  • Dorothy Chou: A graduate from Georgetown University joined Google as policy analyst in 2008.
  • Jennifer Taylor: held positions at Ron Lewis and the British Embassy during 2000 – 2010 before joining Google in 2010 as a new lobbyist for the second quarter as a policy analyst.

The search giant has spent $150,000 on Podesta Group Inc, $120,000 on Dutko Worldwide, $90,000 on Franklin Square Group, $60,000on Liberty Partners group and $50,000 on McBee Strategic Consulting.


[Video] Google Redesigns Images Search Engine With A Microsoft Bing Look

July 20, 2010

Google is holding a special event today in San Francisco to highlight the upcoming features for its Search Engine with a primary focus on Image Search alone.

Reports are already rolling out of the new design for the image search, which, not surprisingly is quite similar to the more visual interface of Bing from Microsoft. Of course that doesn’t mean Google is copying the entire design.

Before I go any further, it is important I share an astonishing fact on Google Images. The search engine began with 250 million images when it launched Image Search, that number has now soared to over 10 billion images to date. That number is obviously the translation of images that are publicly available for the Google to crawl through and index.The image search registers more than a billion pages a day as visitors make a stop and search for numerous things, from pictures of Hurricane Katrina, destruction of the Haiti Earthquake, to products they are interested in buying and celebrities. Not surprisingly, Google Images has a picture for every search you make [almost].

The event started off with Marissa Myers, the VP at Google Search Product and User Experience before she handed the charge of stage to Nate Smith, PM, Google Images. Nate demonstrated numerous features and functionality of the search engine; switching between different image types, searching for similar images and the power the interface adds to the Image search. The results were previously shown with thumbnails along with text descriptions for each, however the redesign would remove them entirely and replace them with more images and the descriptions can be viewed as you hover over each thumbnail.

In my humble opinion, that is visually more pleasant and giving more sense to the phrase “image search”. Users will now be able to view up to a thousand images on a single page of results. Upon clicking on the image itself you are shown a larger preview for the image, instead of nesting the thumbnail in a frame sitting atop the main link. That is pretty intelligent, compared to the senseless frame that sat on the top and users had to perform multiple clicks to actually learn if the image is the right size and quality or wait for the entire page to load at an original location.

Google also announced the new Image Search Ads, which would enable users to run their own image as an advertisement on Image Search. Something we will be talking about in further detail in future.


Gm Snuggles Up To Google, Shows Off The Electric Volt

May 19, 2010

General Motors snuggled closer to Google on Tuesday by announcing it will use Google Maps to add location-based features to its Chevy Volt mobile app.

The carmaker said that with the release of version 2.0 of the app running on Google’s Android software, the smart-phone application will pinpoint the location of cars, even transmit voice-guided directions.

GM offers test-drives of the Chevy Volt. The verdict: largely favorable, with peppy acceleration and tight handling

GM unveiled the mobile app in January at the Consumer Electronics Show. In its present form, it allows owners of the upcoming Volt electric hybrid to check battery charge levels, unlock doors and start engines.

The joint development with Google is clearly a feather in the cap of GM’s OnStar, which is developing the app. Mobile apps are among the hottest trends in technology, and location-based services make a great deal of sense in cars.

But the real news Tuesday was the Volt itself. GM has been guarding details of the car’s feel and handling, and it cast aside the curtain to offer test-drives to a handful of San Francisco journalists. The verdict: largely favorable.

The Volt is GM’s first foray into the emerging electric car market, and instead of a tiny lightweight two seater, it is a roomy-enough mid-sized vehicle in keeping with the majority of cars on the road today.

It boasts respectable economy, with a 375-pound lithium ion battery from LG Chemicals capable of a 40 miles range. The 16 kWh battery has 220 cells and a GM designed heating and cooling system to preserve performance in cold and hot weather. Both heat and cold weather can rob a battery of its charge.

When it drains, a 1.4-liter, 4-cylinder gasoline powered generator kicks in to provide juice to the electric motor.

The car has a comfortable feel on the road. Its shocks are soft enough to absorb the ride and its steering is tight. Like many cars with high-efficiency electric motors, the vehicle has pep and is responsive.

GM is fond of say, it feels like a car, and it does, with the exception that it is quiet. The pleasure of leaving a parking spot with little to no noise is hard not to appreciate.

GM created uncertainty about the Volt by warning the production model, expected before the end of the year, will differ from the prototypes it is showing off. But Tony Posawatz, vehicle line director, put some of the questions to rest.

“The (exterior) look is pretty much representative of what you’ll see in production,” he said. Some small interior changes could take place.

But Posawatz did not solve the biggest mystery: the price. GM has suggested the car could cost about $30,000 after a $7,500 federal tax credit. But late summer is when the sticker will be finalized, he said. “We’re still working through some details.”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers