Will Unprofitable Zipcar Be Another Webvan?

June 1, 2010

Zipcar’s IPO is likely to be an interesting test for clean-tech investing.

The company doesn’t make lithium batteries or solar cells. But it capitalizes on the same green product trends slowly taking shape in the United States and around the world.

Zipcar made a name for itself by convincing people to drive less and rely on car sharing networks when they do. And while it has racked up impressive sales, it is spilling red ink like an underwater oil well and forecasts more losses this year and possibly in the next several to come. So will it be a clean-tech Webvan or eventually a money gusher?

Zipcar had revenue of $131.2 million in 2009, but losses of $4.6 million. More red ink is on the way.

Wall Street may find out later this year as Zipcar said Tuesday it will sell about $75 million of stock to the public.

Some observers suggest the reception could be good despite the losses. Zipcar has built a brand and its cars are increasingly visible in the Bay Area, says Silicon Valley consultant Louis Gray. More importantly, losses at the company have been cut by more than half in the past year while revenue growth is about 30 percent a year.

Some companies “choose growth and seize opportunity” instead of hold down costs to generate profits, Gray says.

But professional investors are cautious. The company doesn’t have a new technology that differentiates it from its rivals – which are low-margin rental companies, such as Avis or Hertz, said one who asked to remain anonymous. It needs to show it can make money from invested capital – perhaps by selecting a typical market, such as San Francisco, and demonstrating  it can turn a profit. Then the task would be to translate that success into a formula it can apply to other markets.

“You don’t want to be another Webvan” and sacrifice profits for unrestrained growth, he said. The online grocer went bankrupt during the 2001 dot-com crash when it found it couldn’t turn a profit.

The venture capital-backed company claims its opportunities for expansion are stunning. Zipcar already operates what it claims is the world’s largest car sharing network, with operations in 13 metropolitan areas and on 150 university campuses in the U.S., Canada and the United Kingdom. It rents cars to a self-service clientele of 400,000 members, who pick them up in reserved parking spots and pay by the hour, or day.

Zipcar claims in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission it has identified 100 metropolitan areas across the globe ripe for expansion. “Given our estimate that ten million driving age residents, business commuters and university community residents live or work within a short walk of a Zipcar, we believe the adoption in our current cities represents only a small fraction of the existing market opportunity,” the filing states.

According to a Frost & Sullivan estimate contained in the document, the car-sharing market could amount to $3.3 billion by 2016.

However, building a profitable business is anything by assured. Revenue was $131.2 million in 2009 before the April acquisition of U.K.’s Streetcar. (Streetcar had revenue of $23.1 million.) Yet the company lost $4.6 million, an improvement from $14.5 million in 2008.

“We expect to incur net losses in 2010 (and) we do not know if our business operations will become profitable or if we will continue to incur net losses in 2011 and beyond. We expect to incur significant future expenses as we develop and expand our business,” according to the SEC filing.

The losses come on top of an accumulated deficit of $56.4 million, with $26.9 million in long-term debt. (Zipcar hopes to pay down this debt with the money from the IPO.)

Still, the company has no trouble calculating a positive value for its stock. That value was $3.49 in July 31, 2009 and $4.37 at the end of December.

With improving financial markets and lower risks in the company’s business the value rose to $5.27 by March 2010, Zipcar says in its filing. It will be interesting to see how accurate the estimate is as losses continue to pile up and investor faith is tested.


Clean Tech IPOs Have Much To Prove, Says Top VC

April 26, 2010

Clean-tech IPOs have yet to prove themselves.

Sure, investor excitement is on the rise with Tesla Motors, Solyndra, Amyris and Ameresco preparing to sell shares to the public. Another potential blockbuster, Silver Spring Networks, is said to have chosen its investment bankers.

It appears the market for clean-tech IPOs is thawing, says Erik Straser, a venture capitalist at Mohr Davidow Ventures

But the track record of recent green IPOs is anything but encouraging. Lithium battery maker A123 Systems went public in September and its shares trade below their introductory price.

Sensata Technologies Holding, a sensor maker from the Netherlands, is hanging onto a gain over its initial price in March, but only a modest one. Biofuel maker Codexis, which debuted its shares last week, is suffering the same fate. And the fortunes of Jinko Solar Holding of China are worse. It canceled its coming out altogether.

“The clean-tech IPOs at this stage are still proving themselves,” says Erik Straser, a partner at the venture firm Mohr Davidow Ventures and leader of its cleantech investment team. Nevertheless, “it appears the markets today are thawing.”

Straser says it is likely there will be more clean-tech IPO filings this year and even a period when less mature companies will go public. That’s because the criteria for what a company needs to interest investors is unsettled.

Several years ago, a high-tech company might need $100 million in annual revenue and profits to attract investors. Clean-tech companies appear to have more latitude. Revenue can be in the neighborhood of $50 million, Straser said in an interview, and business models vary.

Some companies have high production costs and are working them down. Others have businesses that are more future than present. Silicon Valley electric car manufacturer Tesla is an example.

The company sells its Roadster sports car today, but IPO investors will bet on the success of the less expensive Model S sedan, he says. What the Roadster did is show there is a high-end market for high-end electric cars, says Straser, who has invested in green-tech firms such as ZeaChem, Nanosolar and OPX Biotechnologies.

Still, it is hard to predict how clean-tech IPOs will do this year. What is clear is that at some point, investors will become more discriminating and look for more mature companies rather than trendy ones, says Straser. When will this occur? No one knows.


Acquisition Not IPOs Will Be Common Path For Clean Tech Start-ups

November 17, 2009

Clean tech is still a relatively small investment category. In the third quarter, for instance, U.S. venture capitalists poured $898 million into start-ups seeking new ways to generate and save power – about a fifth of the $4.8 billion they spent overall.

This new-kid-on-the-block status will limit the number of companies able to sell stock in public market IPOs. Granted, two clean-tech companies went public in the past two months with reasonable results: A123 and STR Holdings.

"M&A will be the dominant exit over time," says RockPort Capital's Victor Westerlind

But some venture capitalists are not optimistic about the near future. The explanation is one of time and maturity. Clean tech investing only began in earnest four years ago. This is too short a period of time to build a stable of mature, $100-million revenue companies seasoned enough to handle the pressures of public markets.

“We’re actually hopeful we’ll see some IPOs,” says Victor Westerlind, a general partner at RockPort Capital. “But M&A will be the dominant exit over time.”

Clearly there are several handsome candidates for splashy public market debuts: Telsa Motors, Solyndra and Silver Spring Networks, to name a few.

But “I don’t see there being a vast number of smart tech IPOs over the next couple years,” said Accel Partners’ Craig Lawrence last week at the Berkeley Stanford CleanTech Conference in Menlo Park. Mergers and acquisitions will represent respectable outcomes for clean tech start-ups over that time.

And paybacks may not be home runs, but nothing to send to the clubhouse either.


STR Is A Hit But IPOs And Public Companies Are Down Big In The US

November 6, 2009

STR Holdings made a success out of the first solar IPO in 15 months.

The Connecticut company’s stock ended Friday up 31 percent. While the maker of thin-film, or encapsulants, did have to cut the initial offering price of its $13.10 shares (to $10 from a previously anticipated range of $13 to $15), the sizzle was enough to get investors to rush in.

In these hardship days, STR is the exception. IPOs have been rare in recent years, not only in green tech but across the information-technology world. The consequence is that since 1997, the number of public companies in the United States is down 39 percent, or 55 percent when adjusting for GDP growth, according to a new study.

Keeping pace is jobs – 22 million of which have been lost because of the “broken” IPO market, according to the research from Grant Thornton.

Other developed and developing markets have gone in a different direction. Hong Kong listings have doubled since 1997. Germany’s are up 36 percent and Japan’s rebounded 28 percent.

Acording to the new work, the U.S. needs 360 new listings every year just to maintain its base of public companies. Since 2001, the average has been 166.

The study points the finger of blame at low cost stock trading, which has quality Wall Street research, capital commitments and the stock-broker industry.

v

Listed companies in worldwide exchanges. Source: Capital Markets Advisory Panel and others


IPO Activity Increasing Globally Including In Clean Tech

October 9, 2009

A boost of activity in the market for initial public offerings is fueling optimism this critical financial lifeline for new companies may be mending.

“We have witnessed a significant uptick in registration and pre-registration activity (e.g., banker pitches, financial sponsor interest in IPO readiness, CFO searches, etc.),” PricewaterhouseCooper’s Scott Gehsmann said in a press release on Friday.

This signals a growing pipeline of deals, said Gehsmann, a capital markets partner. Gehsmann predicts the number of IPOs this year will exceed the 57 of last year.

The growing interest follows a modestly better third quarter. The number of deals in the United States rose to 20, the highest level since the first quarter of 2008. It is double the number in the third quarter last year.

According to PricewaterhouseCoopers, there were three in the alternative energy industry, two in healthcare, four in high tech and seven in financial services. Among the clean-tech deals was A123 Systems. There was only one clean-tech deal in the third quarter a year ago.

European markets also saw an increase in the third quarter. Offerings volume rose to $2.6 billion, and in the United Kingdom, there was a significant increase in deals. Activity improved in both Hong Kong and Shanghai.

Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers

Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers


A Thaw In Clean Tech IPO Market Possible

September 4, 2009

The past 18 months have been a veritable killing field for IPOs.

Only six venture-backed public offerings made it to the U.S. market in 2008 and five during the first half of 2009.

I think we will see some filings this year with an increase by the middle of 2010, says PricewaterhouseCoopers D. Timothy Carey.

"I think we will see some filings" this year with an increase by the middle of 2010, says PricewaterhouseCooper's D. Timothy Carey.

But now there is more chatter in corporate boardrooms of a comeback getting underway. This appears to be particularly true among clean-tech companies, which might expect to ride the coattails of the public’s fascination with solutions to global warming.

Big name companies such as Tesla and Solyndra are obvious candidates. (I have no specially knowledge that either has plans.)

But it seem clear that after a first half of the year spent worried about survival, talk among board members has turned to public offerings, says D. Timothy Carey, clean-tech leader at PricewaterhouseCoopers.

“I think we will see some filings” this year with an increase by the middle of 2010, Carey said in an interview.

“I’m not here predicting we’re going to have a robust IPO market any time soon,” he said at an SVASE “Shaking the Money Tree” event in Palo Alto on Thursday evening. But there is a thaw going on.

A thaw also appears to be occurring with venture investing as well. During the first quarter of this year, VCs were consumed with steadying their own portfolios. By the second quarter, they began looking around at new deals, but the pace of investing remained low.

“My view is the second half is going to be better,” says Carey. A lot will depend on how fast federal loan guarantees and grants tied to the stimulus spending get into the market.

Smart grid and transportation seem to be the two biggest opportunities this year, he added.


Second Quarter’s Five Venture Backed IPOs Best In A Year But So What

July 1, 2009

The news from the second quarter might easily be mistaken for good.

Five venture-backed IPOs launched during the three months – the highest total since the first quarter of 2008, when there also were five.

Only 10 companies are lined up to follow as IPO activity remains slow

Only 10 companies are lined up to follow as IPO activity remains slow

But activity in the market place remains very slow, so slow few companies even bother to file registration papers with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

According to the National Venture Capital Association and Thomson Reuters, there were five venture-backed initial public offerings during the just ended quarter, five information-technology companies and the clean-tech outfit SolarWinds.

While the total was a boost from the first quarter, when there were none, it is no real departure from the sluggish pace of the past year and a half. Since the start of 2008, only 11 venture-backed companies have sold shares on a public market in the U.S., compared with 86 in 2007 and 57 in 2007.

The market in essence has still not recovered from the dot-com implosion – and it is clearly worrisome for the U.S. economy. IPOs allow young companies to raise cash for expansion and in doing so create jobs.

Young companies also are a source of valuable technological innovation.

“We remain concerned about the extremely thin pipeline of companies in registration as it indicates that it will be some time before we can even be in a position to return to healthy IPO activity levels,” said NVCA President Mark Heesen. Only 10 are registered to offer shares.

The danger for the U.S. economy is that exchanges elsewhere begin to fill the shoes of the Nasdaq and other exchanges in the U.S., that have traditionally welcomed startups.

So far they haven’t. But it is probably just a matter of time. In the second quarter, one venture-backed company launched on a foreign exchange: California based Array Networks went public on the Taiwan exchange.


Venture Capital Profits Take Hit From Sour Market, More Losses To Come

February 2, 2009

The average one-year return on venture-capital funds dropped into the red at the end of the third quarter with more losses to come for performance in the fourth quarter and beyond.

Through the end of September, one-year VC returns were -1.6, down 7 percentage points from June, according to Thomson Reuters and the National Venture Capital Association.

The negative performance reflects the lack of IPO activity and the slowing mergers and acquisitions market, said NVCA President Mark Heesen. “We expect to see further declines in the short-term performance numbers into 2009 until the exit markets improve.”

Over the three-year horizon, venture funds continued to show profits of 6.6 percent. Long-term calculations are less affected by a recent market slowing.

Returns for venture-capital funds through September 2008

Returns for venture-capital funds through September 2008


IPOs Of Venture Backed Companies Hits 30 Year Low In 2008

January 5, 2009

Last year proved the worst in 30 years for venture-backed initial public offerings. Only six took place, the fewest since 1977, according to a report released Monday by the National Venture Capital Association and Thomson Reuters.

NVCA, Thomson Reuters

Source: NVCA, Thomson Reuters

The study also found that only 260 mergers and acquisitions of venture-funded companies occurred during the year, the first since 2003 with fewer than 300.

“The inability of our strongest companies to go public and the softening of acquisition activity continue to have a major ripple effect,” said NVCA President Mark Heesen. “As a result, new investments and fundraising will slow considerably in 2009 until the exit markets re-open and the pipeline is cleared.”

The report said that no IPOs of venture-funded companies took place in the fourth quarter – the second last year with no activity. During the year, 40 companies withdrew their planned IPO registration papers and 28 startups remain on file to go public.

By the end of December, five of the six companies that did launch IPOs last year were trading below their IPO offering price, the study said.

In the fourth quarter, 37 M&A deals involving venture-backed companies were reported. Information-technology firms dominated the playing field, accounting for 30 deals.


New Theory On The Demise Of IPOs: Cheap Stock Trading, A Re-Focused Wall Street, VCs Seeking Buyouts

December 8, 2008

Conventional wisdom says the IPO market is in a cyclical downturn made worse by the credit crisis pummeling the economy.

But a new darker view is emerging, according to a study by the auditing firm Grant Thornton. The IPO market is structurally damaged – and closed to 80 percent of the technology and other startups that need it for money to expand.

The result is slower economic growth in the U.S., fewer jobs created, and an environment where tomorrow’s corporate leaders have a tougher time growing to their potential.

The study argues that the time for a cyclical rebound has passed. The “U.S. economy, with an abundance of venture capital, should have produced over 500 IPOs every year for each of the last four years; however, this is not the reality,” the November study says.

IPOs are down sharply since 2001

IPOs are down sharply since 2001

Instead, with more than $440 billion of venture capital raised since 1996, only an average of 134 companies have gone public each year since the dot-com bubble burst in 2001. An annual average of 520 IPOs were launched during the five years before the 1996 to 2000 bubble and an average of 539 a year during the bubble.

To explain the change, Grant Thornton points to the advent of online trading in 1996, which led to a sharp cut in stock trading fees – to $25 or less a trade. The impact forced retail stockbrokers into the role of fee-based financial advisors, and in doing so killed “the very best stock marketing engine the world had ever known,” the study says.

With lower trading fees, Wall Street firms were unable to conduct as much stock research as before – especially into smaller, just-public companies. Cheap fees also encouraged speculative short-term trading at the expense of long-term investing, among professional as well as retail investors.

The study downplays the role of Sarbanes-Oxley, which is often cited for the IPO decline. The 2002 law did increase costs and lengthen the time it takes for companies to go public, but it is only one factor and probably not the major factor, the study says.

With the IPO market on the sidelines, most “liquidity exits” for startups have been mergers and acquisitions, frequently with large corporate buyers. Instead of giving some of these young companies that chance to bloom into large, independent, public companies, “big corporations are eating our young as (these startups) starve for capital before they have the opportunity to reach adulthood,” the study says. “Their true potential will never be known.”

The secondary impact is to make VCs less reluctant to fund companies that don’t have an obvious Fortune 500 buyer. “Gone are the days when most venture capitalists would so willingly pioneer new industries and technologies (e.g.: semiconductors, computers and biotechnology) that have no obvious outlet other than the IPO market,” the study says.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers