Expect More Solar Mergers This Year

March 3, 2010

Solar energy is not the easiest of businesses. Profit margins are thin as over production continues to push solar cell prices lower.

"A lot of companies aren't going to be around anymore," says K Scott Son, director of finance at Suntech America

Meanwhile, banks remain reluctant to finance big projects, unconvinced they will produce power cheaper than coal and natural gas plants.

Sure, demand has recovered modestly since the depths of last year’s recession. But not enough to head off a period of consolidation with stronger companies swallowing up weaker ones to capture market share and improve the bottom line.

“A lot of companies aren’t going to be around anymore,” predicted K. Scott Son, director of finance at Suntech America, at last week’s Cleantech Forum. “It’s only a matter of time before there is consolidation.”

The pairing has already begun. Last month, U.S. SunPower said it would acquire SunRay Renewable Energy, the Italian solar plant developer, and late last year, Siemens agreed to buy solar thermal company Solel from Israel. MEMC has also put money on the table. It scooped up solar farm developer Sun Edison.

Companies can pick up additional margin by expanding vertically, says Ullas Naik of Globespan Capital Partners

More deals will follow. It makes sense for companies to “vertically integrate,” in other words, expand from manufacturing solar cells to building solar plants, says Ullas Naik, managing director at Globespan Capital Partners. They can pick up additional margin.

They also will create larger companies more likely to qualify for bank financing. Banks are less likely to lend to a project if they fear the solar panel supplier won’t  be in business 25 years from now to stand behind a product warranty.

Suntech is one company looking to expand into “distribution,” says Son. “It’s a way of ensuring our panels will be used.”

It’s also a way of bringing stability to a fragmented industry where big suppliers see attractive prospects for growth.


In A Slow Merger Market, Companies Like ShotSpotter Make Discriminating Buyers

April 29, 2009

It is no secret that many venture-backed startups would give their first-born children to be acquired.

That’s because the alternative is bleak. VCs are handing out cash slower than they have in a decade, and many companies without suitors are forced to close their doors.

Unfortunately for many of these partner-hungry startups, the deal flow also is at a low. In the first quarter, only 68 venture-backed companies were sold, down 35 percent from 104 a year earlier.

People do approach us monthly, if not weekly interested in being acquired, says James Beldock

"People do approach us monthly, if not weekly" interested in being acquired, says James Beldock

That makes ShotSpotter’s deal announced Tuesday all the more worth looking at. ShotSpotter announced the acquisition of Planning Systems, a unit of QinetiQ North America, for an undisclosed amount.

“People do approach us monthly, if not weekly,” says James Beldock, CEO of ShotSpotter, referring to the stream of startups eager to sell themselves.

But instead of a deal simply to increase the company’s size, Beldock settled on a merger with hands-down strategic value.

ShotSpotter sells technology that enables police departments in cities around the country to pinpoint the location of gunshots. It uses sensors, as many as 20 per square mile, to continuously monitor troubled areas.

Planning Systems makes a similar technology for military and defense markets. And it has key sensor patents.

“It clearly is a buyer’s market,” says Beldock. And that buyer is more discriminating than ever.


In A Slow M&A Market, Companies Like ShotSpotter Make Discriminating Buyers

April 20, 2009

It is no secret that many venture-backed startups would give their first-born children to be acquired.

That’s because the alternative is bleak. VCs are handing out cash slower than they have in a decade, and many companies without suitors are forced to close their doors.

People approach us monthly, if not weekly, looking to get acquired, says James Beldock

"People approach us monthly, if not weekly," looking to get acquired, says James Beldock

Unfortunately for many of these partner-hungry startups, the deal flow also is at a low. In the first quarter, only 68 venture-backed companies were sold, down 35 percent from 104 a year earlier.

That makes ShotSpotter’s deal announced Tuesday all the more worth looking at. ShotSpotter announced the acquisition of Planning Systems, a unit of QinetiQ North America, for an undisclosed amount.

“People do approach us monthly, if not weekly,” says James Beldock, CEO of ShotSpotter, referring to the stream of startups eager to sell themselves.

But instead of a deal simply to increase the company’s size, Beldock settled on a merger with hands-down strategic value.

ShotSpotter sells technology that enables police departments in cities around the country to pinpoint the location of gunshots. It uses sensors, as many as 20 per square mile, to continuously monitor troubled areas.

Planning Systems makes a similar technology for military and defense markets. And it has key sensor patents.

“It clearly is a buyer’s market,” says Beldock. And that buyer is more discriminating than ever.


Venture Industry Suffering Longest IPO Drought On Record

April 1, 2009

The venture capital industry has not seen an IPO in almost eight months, Dow Jones VentureSource reported Wednesday.

The venture capital landscape is tough with M&A down 65% in the first quarter

The venture capital landscape is tough with M&A down 65% in the first quarter

That qualifies as the worst liquidity drought on record. It also makes turning a profit next to impossible.

During the first quarter, venture partners generated just $3.2 billion for their funds – all of it from the mergers and acquisitions of their portfolio companies. The total was down 65 percent from a year ago as only 68 companies were sold compared with 104 in the first quarter of 2008, VentureSource says.

VentureSource said is saw no immediate sign of a change in the climate for initial public offerings, though 43 companies are in registration to sell stock.

“It’s a tough time to be a venture capitalist – and likely even tougher to be an investor in a venture fund,” said Jessica Canning, global research director.

Information technology startups were hit especially hard in the quarter. Only 43 companies were sold, the fewest in 10 years. The largest transaction in the period was the $700 million purchase of medical-device maker CoreValve of Irving, CA, by Medtronic.


Venture Capital Profits Take Hit From Sour Market, More Losses To Come

February 2, 2009

The average one-year return on venture-capital funds dropped into the red at the end of the third quarter with more losses to come for performance in the fourth quarter and beyond.

Through the end of September, one-year VC returns were -1.6, down 7 percentage points from June, according to Thomson Reuters and the National Venture Capital Association.

The negative performance reflects the lack of IPO activity and the slowing mergers and acquisitions market, said NVCA President Mark Heesen. “We expect to see further declines in the short-term performance numbers into 2009 until the exit markets improve.”

Over the three-year horizon, venture funds continued to show profits of 6.6 percent. Long-term calculations are less affected by a recent market slowing.

Returns for venture-capital funds through September 2008

Returns for venture-capital funds through September 2008


IPOs Of Venture Backed Companies Hits 30 Year Low In 2008

January 5, 2009

Last year proved the worst in 30 years for venture-backed initial public offerings. Only six took place, the fewest since 1977, according to a report released Monday by the National Venture Capital Association and Thomson Reuters.

NVCA, Thomson Reuters

Source: NVCA, Thomson Reuters

The study also found that only 260 mergers and acquisitions of venture-funded companies occurred during the year, the first since 2003 with fewer than 300.

“The inability of our strongest companies to go public and the softening of acquisition activity continue to have a major ripple effect,” said NVCA President Mark Heesen. “As a result, new investments and fundraising will slow considerably in 2009 until the exit markets re-open and the pipeline is cleared.”

The report said that no IPOs of venture-funded companies took place in the fourth quarter – the second last year with no activity. During the year, 40 companies withdrew their planned IPO registration papers and 28 startups remain on file to go public.

By the end of December, five of the six companies that did launch IPOs last year were trading below their IPO offering price, the study said.

In the fourth quarter, 37 M&A deals involving venture-backed companies were reported. Information-technology firms dominated the playing field, accounting for 30 deals.


In Startup Fire Sale, Sparks Will Fly As Buyer And VC Negotiate Terms

December 15, 2008

Legal bickering will steal attention from struggling startups over the next year as Silicon Valley venture capitalists manage the sales of companies they hurriedly negotiated this year.

For the past several months, VCs have pruned startups from their portfolios at fire-sale prices to avoid losses in a protracted downturn. While this weeding frees money otherwise spent to support struggling companies, it also opens firms to the wrangling of post-closing negotiations in a tough economy.

Tough markets make conflicts more likely, says Paul Koenig

Tough markets make conflicts more likely, says Paul Koenig

Observers say these clashes – which can result in legal action – will increase at just the wrong time: when VCs should be helping to steer companies through a tough market place.

Difficult days make buyers more aggressive and controversies all the more likely, says Paul Koenig, co-founder of Shareholder Representative Services, a company that helps venture-backed companies manage acquisitions. “We would expect to see an increase” in post-buyout clashes.

In today’s environment, VCs are sometimes letting startups go for little more than the cash on their balance sheets. Fund managers are picking winner and losers at a rapid pace to avoid carrying companies through years of a market recovery.

Koenig says he has seen distressed deals taking place, but also smart ones not made in haste. “It’s not all doom and gloom,” he says

Still, post-merger negotiations will be a burden on VCs, especially those named the post-merger representative of the selling company stockholders.

As problems crop up, negotiations between buyers and sellers take place, many times over collecting receivables, managing inventory reserves, keeping track of cash on the balance sheet and resolving issues brought by employees let go.

When times are tough, organizations sue each other more frequently, he said.

Koenig says the environment should be good for his San Francisco company. Shareholder Representative Services launched its service in September 2007 and this year handled 28 deals for clients.

Next year’s workload should be between 50 and 60 deals at a minimum. It is possible the firm will reach 100, he said.


Startup Fire Sale: VCs Dispatch Young Companies At Rapid Pace To Avoid Losses

November 26, 2008

Venture capitalists and angel investors are closing, selling and otherwise dispatching portfolio companies at a rapid pace, eager to avoid the losses that plagued the industry after the dot.com bust.

In some instances, companies are sold for the cash on their balance sheet, essentially valuing their businesses at nothing, say entrepreneurs and investors.

Invetors selling companies faster than they should

Investors selling companies faster than they should

In others, an acquirer’s obligation in a buyout might be little more than the liability of a severance package for employees to be let go.

In many instance, VCs are simply unwilling to fund the youngest of their companies for what they calculate could be four years or more. That’s how long some worry it could take for the IPO market to open up again.

“I think the funds are picking their winners and losers really fast,” says Scott Yara, president and co-founder of the database startup Greenplum.

The rapid realignment of the venture business since late September contrasts sharply with slower shakeup that followed the dot-com bust in 2001, when VCs and angel investors held onto their companies hoping for a quick turnaround. Back then, several years of a slow economy led to write-downs, company failures and poor returns for funds.

VCs are reacting “much faster than last time,” says Ben Smith, chairman and co-founder of MerchantCircle, “much faster than they should.”

Investors reason that their companies will have a hard time getting additional financing or hitting business milestones – which would increase their attractiveness to future investors. At the same time, forecasts for growth are coming down 50 or 60 percent.

Without the prospect of new capital, companies burning through $500,000 a month will need to turn to their original investors for more money. This burden could quickly add up to more than a venture fund is willing to pay. Selling them for next to nothing and getting a small equity stake in a better-financed acquirer is seen as a worthwhile option.

A lot of good companies are being killed off or sold, says Smith.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers