Major Fusion Breakthrough Claimed: Power Plants That Burn Nuclear Waste

March 5, 2010

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is predicting a major breakthrough in the long intractable science of nuclear fusion, claiming it will ignite a fusion reaction in two years.

"We're starting to feel like we're getting some traction," says Lawrence Livermore scientist Tom Anklam of the lab's fusion researcb.

Scientist Tom Anklam during a Thursday evening address said the lab’s National Ignition Facility intends to create a “quasi continuous reaction” in 2012 using the world’s largest laser, installed at the California facility about a year ago.

Success could lead to 1000 MW power plant prototype in eight to 10 years, he told a small gathering at the Palo Alto Research Center in Silicon Valley.

The prospect of a hybrid fusion-fission plant – where atoms are joined together to release enormous amounts of energy and plutonium is consumed – is the stuff of science fiction. If shown to work, the procedure could generate between a third and two-thirds of the nation’s electricity by 2100.

It is estimated the country has enough nuclear waste to fuel the plants for several hundred years.

“Ignition,” as scientists refer to the reaction, was initially expected in 2011. But delays in the construction of the Laser Inertial Fusion Engine, where the laser is housed, pushed back the date.

Nevertheless, Anklam said researchers are more optimistic today about their work. “We’re starting to feel like we’re getting some traction,” he said. It also looks like the process is economically viable, he added, suggesting that as a result fusion could be a significant contributor to the country’s power profile by mid century.

The project was funded by the Department of Energy more than seven years ago as a way to harness nuclear power in a safer, more environmentally sound manner than the present generation of light-water, uranium fired plants. It also was seen as a way to dispose of the nuclear waste accumulating from the military and civilian use of uranium and plutonium.

Today, with global warming a growing concern, it has the added benefit of being carbon free.

But it won’t be cheap. The government spends several hundred million dollars on the research today and financial demands will climb into the billions of dollars in years to come.

Part of the project’s cost is the laser, which harnesses 192 beams to focus 500 terawatts of power – more than the output of all the nation’s power plants – on a space the size of a BB.

Anklam expects the cost of fusion power plants will ultimately be similar to those of today’s nuclear plants. If they improve America’s competitiveness by supplying a near endless source of energy, they could be worth the price.


Department Of Energy Sees Major Spot For Nuclear In National Energy Picture

October 9, 2009

Nuclear energy “must play a major role as we face the threat of climate change and transition to a thriving clean energy economy,” Department of Energy Secretary
Steven Chu said Friday.

Chu’s comment on nuclear came as the department announced that it expects to grant as much as $50 million for nuclear energy research at universities next year. The goal is to ensure the United States remains on the cutting edge of nuclear technology, he said,

The nation presently has 104 nuclear power plants in operation, but hasn’t built a new one since the 1970s. Utilities are proposing 25 new plants over the next decade, largely in Sunbelt states. Financing remains a problem.

Nuclear Plants In Teh US. Source: Nuclear Street

Nuclear Plants In Teh US. Source: Nuclear Street


Is Nuclear The Solution To Global Warming

August 20, 2009

Fact of the day: the world needs roughly 14 terawatts of carbon-free power in the next 40 years to make a reasonable stab at containing greenhouse-gas warming.

Satisfying world energy demand would require building one nuclear plant a day until mid century.

Satisfying world energy demand would require building one nuclear plant a day until mid century.

That figure stems from two assumptions. First, global energy demand will double by mid century from today’s 14 terawatts (or 14 trillion watts).

Second, a reasonable goal will be to keep atmospheric CO2 at or below 550 parts per million compared with today’s 280 ppm.

Will nuclear power be able to shoulder the burden? Not likely. To satisfy projected demand, the world will need to build a gigawatt-sized nuclear plant each day between now and mid century, says Robert Armstrong, deputy director of MIT’s Energy Initiative.

Such a pace of construction is almost inconceivable. Only one country has the capacity to build a nuclear reactor and that is Japan. Unfortunately, production is sold out for the next nine years.

The solution to global warming may include nuclear but needs to look far beyond splitting the atom.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers