
Nvidia's countersuit could force Intel to stop selling its graphics chipsets, Nehalem and Larrabee!
Did Intel took over Microsoft as the bad boy of the tech industry?
OK, Microsoft is still facing an EU complaint, but that’s “almost” nothing compare to the lawsuits Intel has attracted: AMD (of course!), South Korea (yep… the country!), the FTC aka the U.S. government, New York state (?), the European Union and today Nvidia.
Before we get into the “meat” of Nvidia’s “breach of contract” complaint, an advice to Intel CEO, Paul Otellini: in this economy, isn’t it better to make friends and mea culpas and move on, rather than accumulate anger, lawsuits and finally being perceived as a bully and a monopolist? If you don’t believe me, ask Steve (Microsoft’s CEO)!
Anyway, back to Nvidia’s lawsuit. The Santa Clara, Calif.-graphics chip maker argues that Intel wants to use its graphics patents in exchange of… nothing!
Intel bans Nvidia to build chipsets for Nehalem
Nvidia claims that Intel is using its graphics patents in the current generation of graphics chipsets and the upcoming Larrabee graphics processor and Nehalem CPU.
“4 years ago, we signed an agreement with Intel that gave them our GPU playbook patents in exchange to connect our chipsets to their CPU. Now they are claiming they can use our patents portfolio, but that we can’t access to their next-generation CPUs [Nehalem],” explains Nvidia’s spokesperson, Bob Sherbin.
Sherbin to add,
“It’s like if you lease a house, but then your landlord decides to build a fence, lock it and don’t give you the keys!”
I’ll be mad too!
To read Intel’s initial filing, go here.
To read NVIDIA’s response and counterclaim, click here.
Posted by TechPulse 360 




For the first time since 2000, shipments fell from the third to the fourth quarters, said Jon Peddie Research.

