Only 3,000 Comments On New Facebook Privacy Policy

March 19, 2009

I would have expected more.

Facebook threw open its privacy policy to public comment late last month after privacy groups criticized a proposed change giving it more liberty to use personal data from members.

Facebooks principles include making information about its plans, policies and opertions public

Facebook's principles include making information about its plans, policies and opertions public

The company backed away from the change and in response gave users of its site the chance to express themselves on its latest policy. The open-door approach was billed at the time as a democratization of the site.

Apparently many Facebook members don’t feel democracy is necessary or are less concerned about privacy policy than the advocates assume.

In any event, Facebook said in a blog post it has received “nearly 3,000” comments and more than 10,000 members in each of two town hall groups formed around its Facebook Principals and Statement of Rights and Responsibilities.

The comment period remains open until 12:01 am on March 29.

Until then, “the Facebook legal team is busy reading through your feedback to identify common threads that we hope to address with a revised version of the documents that will then be put up for a vote,” according to the post.


Facebook Does An About Face On Privacy Changes

February 18, 2009

Facebook abandoned several changes to its privacy policy in the face of a backlash from privacy groups concerned it could take too many liberties with a member’s personal data.

A substantial revision to the policy in coming, says Mark Zuckerberg

A substantial revision to the policy in coming, says Mark Zuckerberg

The social networking site reverted to its old terms of use late Tuesday, promising a “substantial revision” to the policy sometime in the future “written clearly in language everyone can understand,” according to a blog post by founder Mark Zuckerberg.

“More than 175 million people use Facebook,” Zuckerberg said. “Our terms aren’t just a document that protect our rights; it’s the governing document for how the service is used by everyone across the world. Given its importance, we need to make sure the terms reflect the principles and values of the people using the service.”

Two weeks ago, Facebook had changed the terms of service guidelines giving it the right to use personal data in the way it wanted, even if a user removed it. This included after a member terminated his or her Facebook account.

In response, the Electronic Privacy Information Center had threatened legal action and consumer-rights blogs were in full lather.

The terms are now back to the way they were: “You may remove your User Content from the Site at any time. If you choose to remove your User Content, the license granted above will automatically expire, however you acknowledge that the Company may retain archived copies of your User Content. Facebook does not assert any ownership over your User Content; rather…you retain full ownership of all of your User Content…”


Facebook Clarifies Privacy Policy: You Can’t Take It When You Go

February 16, 2009

Two weeks ago, Facebook posted revised terms-of-service guidelines on its Web site. On Monday, it tried to squelch a tempest that has blown up around them.

The changes give Facebook the right to keep and use information a user has created and posted, even after the person has terminated his or her membership.

Without ths license, Facebook couldnt help people share information, says Mark Zuckerberg

Without ths license, Facebook couldn't help people share information, says Mark Zuckerberg

One new section, reported on this weekend by the Consumerist blog, reads as follows:

“The following sections will survive any termination of your use of the Facebook Service: Prohibited Conduct, User Content, Your Privacy Practices, Gift Credits, Ownership; Proprietary Rights, Licenses, Submissions, User Disputes; Complaints, Indemnity, General Disclaimers, Limitation on Liability, Termination and Changes to the Facebook Service, Arbitration, Governing Law; Venue and Jurisdiction and Other.”

Previously, users of the social networking site had the right to remove their content at any time.

On Monday, founder Mark Zuckerberg said in a blog post the company won’t share personal information against a user’s wish.

At the same time, there is no system today that lets someone share an e-mail address, for example, and then control what the person receiving the address does with it.

Zuckerberg writes: “When a person shares information on Facebook, they first need to grant Facebook a license to use that information so that we can show it to the other people they’ve asked us to share it with. Without this license, we couldn’t help people share that information.

“When a person shares something like a message with a friend, two copies of that information are created—one in the person’s sent messages box and the other in their friend’s inbox. Even if the person deactivates their account, their friend still has a copy of that message. We think this is the right way for Facebook to work.”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers