Utilities Remain Paralyzed On Grid Storage Decisions

March 11, 2010

Grid storage is universally thought of as a good idea. But utilities don’t yet have a clue which technologies to choose and where to deploy them.

"We all agree it's a good idea," says Paul De Martini of Southern California Edison. But "we're at 50,000 feet."

The uncertainty could delay the spread of renewable energy, particular solar and wind energy, as executives evaluate options and wait for clear winners in the market. Both solar and wind create intermittent power streams making the ability to store energy for when the sun goes down or the wind stops blowing critical.

This dilemma is apparent to Paul De Martini, vice president of advanced technology at Southern California Edison, who spoke Wednesday afternoon at Stanford University.

“We’re at 50,000 feet” in terms of understanding the market, says De Martini. “We all agree it’s a good idea.” But the utility doesn’t know how much storage it needs and whether it should deploy it near homes, near transmission facilities or somewhere between.

De Martini says he has identified 40 different storage technologies that are under development. They range from lithium ion batteries, to uphill water pumps, flywheels and ice storage.

In discussions with the companies, it is difficult for Southern California Edison to describe exactly what its needs are, he said. And “there’s not a really good set of requirements out in the industry.”

Some say the short-term answer is all of the above. “We need to be thinking about storage in every form,” says Jim Detmers, vice president of operations, at California ISO, which runs the state’s electric transmission gird. “We don’t want to limit ourselves to just one type.”

And yet that will likely delay implementation and cost more, since more development money will need to be spent. In an address last week, Energy Secretary Steven Chu said his favorite is a technology that pumps water uphill, only to let it flow down again and spin turbines when the sun stops shining. Perhaps a high profile test project is in order.


Evidence Of Global Warming Strengthens, Say Energy Secretary Chu

March 9, 2010

Evidence of global warming continues to accumulate, says Energy Secretary Steven Chu, with dire warnings for those who ignore it.

"This is the smoking gun," says Energy Secretary Steven Chu.

New research reinforces the claim that human activities are behind the build up of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, Chu said during an address at Stanford University.

“This is the smoking gun,” he said. “The carbon in the atmosphere is due to humans.”

The new research examines the types of carbon in the atmosphere and compares the ratio of carbon-14, a rare form of carbon created in the upper atmosphere, to carbon-12, formed by the burning of fossil fuels. It offers unequivocal proof, he said

Chu warned that the dangers of business as usual could be considerable. During the last ice age, average global temperatures were 6 degrees Celsius cooler than today. And yet much of Europe and North America lay under sheets of ice.

If the world continues unimpeded to burn fossil fuels, temperatures could rise 3 to 6 degrees Celsius. “Six degrees represent a profound change,” he said.

To many, the dangers of climate change seem remote because changing temperatures are difficult to measure over a span of 20 to 30 years. In recent years, for instance, temperatures seem to have reached a plateau.

But scientists looking at a 150-year period observe a rise and steeper rises will come, Chu said. The impact of the increasing CO2 “won’t be fully felt for 100 years…cause the oceans have to warm up.”

The way to fight this rise, many experts say, is to limit the use of fossil fuels by putting a price on carbon. “We will live in a carbon constrained world,” Chu agreed. It may take five years to arrive; it may take 10. “It is coming,” he said.


Steven Chu’s Top Green Technologies (Hint: No Thin Film)

March 9, 2010

Energy Secretary Steven Chu is the first to admit the nation faces a clean-energy technology gap.

"We don't have all the technolgy we need to reduce carbon by 80 percent by mid century," says Energy Secretary Steven Chu

“We don’t have all the technology we need to reduce carbon by 80 percent by mid century,” Chu said Monday. “We need better technology.”

Advancing the state of green tech is the reason he invested $80 billion of Recovery Act funds in clean-tech research, product development and generating capacity. The nation needs to prepare itself for the green economy of the 21st Century at a time when countries, such as China, are pouring in lots of money of their own.

We are falling behind in the clean-tech race,” he said during an address at Stanford University.

And yet, all is not bad news. During his address, Chu listed several technologies where the U.S. is making progress and which could have a powerful impact in the decades to come. They include:

*Utility-scale energy storage,  an important addition to the energy grid as more renewable power comes from sometimes on, sometimes off wind and solar. The best way to achieve store energy is by pumping water up a hill, says Chu. When the power is needed, water is released, driving turbines. The energy loss: just 25 percent, far better than batteries, he says.

*Offshore wind has a great deal of untapped potential, adds Chu. But maintaining turbines is difficult in a marine environment due to storms and salt water.

One encouraging step is Clipper Windpower’s work on a massive 10 MW offshore wind turbine, says Chu.

*In the solar market, the cost of solar cells has dropped by a factor of 10. But it isn’t low enough for panels to be competitive without government subsidies. That could rapidly change, says Chu. Module costs are about $2 a watt, but will drop to less than $1 by the end of the year.

The drop will help rooftop solar compete. Rooftop systems still cost $4 a watt to install, with the panels accounting for half of the bill. At $1.50 cents installed, solar becomes cost efficient without subsidies, he says.

Chu says it is not clear whether low cost thin-film cells will outsell the polysilicon cells that make up the majority of today’s market. Polysilicon cells keep making gains with efficiency.

*The transportation sector is the toughest to achieve energy improvements. Lithium ion batteries don’t have near the energy density of gasoline or diesel. Fortunately, electric motors are highly efficient.

One breath of fresh air may come from aluminum batteries, says Chu. Aluminum could help cut battery costs by a factor of 10. Suddenly all the energy required by a building could be stored in a battery the size of a room.


The US Is In Danger Of Losing The Clean Tech Race, Says Energy Secretary Chu

March 8, 2010

The United States risks losing the race to a clean-tech economy if it fails to get serious about global warming, Energy Department Secretary Steven Chu said Monday.

Taking five years or longer to pass energy legislation will limit the nation’s ability to be a leader in the green-energy technologies of tomorrow, Chu said during an address at Stanford University.

American prosperity is at stake, said Energy Secretary Steven Chu.

“I think we will lose (and) end up purchasing equipment from abroad,” he said. “The future prosperity of the United States is at risk.”

Chu used the midday speech to renew his call for an energy bill from Congress. But he also highlighted the danger more motivated countries, particularly China, pose to a complacent country.

China is spending $9 billion a month to diversify its energy production, he noted. One advanced power line project by itself will cost $88 billion over the next decade as high-efficiency high-tension wires are strung 1,200 miles from east to west. The wires will transport energy to the coastal population centers with miniscule energy losses of as little as 5 percent.

In 1996, the U.S. was the leading manufacturer of solar panels. Now its market share is below 10 percent, Chu added. “We are falling behind in the clean-energy race.”

He argued that the importance of energy legislation can’t be overstated. A properly crafted bill will set a price on carbon and a cap on permitted emissions, giving companies the clarity to begin making investments. Even a modest bill can provide an important signal to the market, he said

That Obama Administration has made the goal of energy legislation a top priority. Chu hoped to push the effort along: “I would like to have it this year.”

But the nation needs more than legislation. The Recovery Act passed at the start of the Obama Administration set aside $80 billion for clean technology development. However, many of the grants and tax credits it included have been allocated.

More money will be needed, Chu said. “We still need tens of billions of dollars at a minimum a year. The Recovery Act was a start of that.”

Chu said the future prosperity of the country hangs in the balance. So does the U.S.’s first climate change counter punch, a long awaited first blow.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers